Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30170606›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2018

Quality of life measures and health utility values among dry eye subgroups.

Chika Shigeyasu, Masakazu Yamada, Motoko Kawashima, Kazuhisa Suwaki, Miki Uchino, Yoshimune Hiratsuka, Norihiko Yokoi, Kazuo Tsubota, DECS-J study group

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chika ShigeyasuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. shigeyasu@eye-center.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3037-8744
Masakazu YamadaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Motoko KawashimaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhisa SuwakiSanten Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Miki UchinoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshimune HiratsukaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Norihiko YokoiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kazuo TsubotaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
DECS-J study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo determine whether quality of life (QOL) and health utility are affected to the same extent among dry eye (DE) patients with short tear film break-up time dry eye (TBUT-DE) with minimal clinical signs were as severe as aqueous-deficient dry eye (ADDE).

methodsA multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted among DE patients who visited one of 10 eye clinics in Japan. Among the 463 registered patients, this study involved 449 patients with DE who were aged 20 years or older. Ophthalmic examination findings were assessed, including tear film break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer I value, and keratoconjunctival staining score. QOL was evaluated with the Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score (DEQS; 0 [best], 100 [worst]) and health utility (1 [total health], 0 [worst]) with the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI-3); scores were stratified by DE subgroup.

resultsMedian (interquartile range) of DEQS and HUI-3 scores across all participants were 21.7 (10.0-40.0) and 0.82 (0.69-0.91), respectively. Median (interquartile range) DEQS and HUI-3 scores in the ADDE group were 23.3 (10.0-40.0) and 0.79 (0.69-0.88), respectively; those in the short TBUT-DE group were 23.3 (13.3-38.3) and 0.82 (0.74-0.92), respectively. There were no significant between-group differences in questionnaire scores. Among the ophthalmic examination findings, a weak significant correlation between TBUT, corneal staining score and keratoconjunctival staining score to DEQS; TBUT and Schirmer test values to HUI-3, were seen.

conclusionsThe burden of short TBUT-DE on QOL as assessed by the DEQS and HUI-3 was as severe as that in ADDE. Our findings suggest that clinicians should be aware of the impact of short TBUT-DE on patients QOL and utility values.

trial registrationUniversity Hospital Medical Information Network (registration no. UMIN 000015890). Registered 10th December 2014, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDry Eye SyndromesFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesCross-sectional studyDry eyeHealth utility assessmentShort tear film break-up timeVisual quality of life

Identifiers

PMID30170606
PMCPMC6119313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.