Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30170591›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2018

SNOMED CT standard ontology based on the ontology for general medical science.

Shaker El-Sappagh, Francesco Franda, Farman Ali, Kyung-Sup Kwak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. VarGuideAtlas: a repository of variant interpretation guidelines.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
  16. Fine-tuning large language models for rare disease concept normalization.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Rare Disease Concept Normalization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shaker El-SappaghInformation Systems Department, Faculty of Computers and Informatics, Benha University, Banha, Egypt.
Francesco FrandaDepartment of Philosophy, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Farman AliDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Inha University, Incheon, South Korea.
Kyung-Sup KwakDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Inha University, Incheon, South Korea. kskwak@inha.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-9559-4352

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT, hereafter abbreviated SCT) is a comprehensive medical terminology used for standardizing the storage, retrieval, and exchange of electronic health data. Some efforts have been made to capture the contents of SCT as Web Ontology Language (OWL), but these efforts have been hampered by the size and complexity of SCT.

methodOur proposal here is to develop an upper-level ontology and to use it as the basis for defining the terms in SCT in a way that will support quality assurance of SCT, for example, by allowing consistency checks of definitions and the identification and elimination of redundancies in the SCT vocabulary. Our proposed upper-level SCT ontology (SCTO) is based on the Ontology for General Medical Science (OGMS).

resultsThe SCTO is implemented in OWL 2, to support automatic inference and consistency checking. The approach will allow integration of SCT data with data annotated using Open Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) Foundry ontologies, since the use of OGMS will ensure consistency with the Basic Formal Ontology, which is the top-level ontology of the OBO Foundry. Currently, the SCTO contains 304 classes, 28 properties, 2400 axioms, and 1555 annotations. It is publicly available through the bioportal at http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/SCTO/ .

conclusionThe resulting ontology can enhance the semantics of clinical decision support systems and semantic interoperability among distributed electronic health records. In addition, the populated ontology can be used for the automation of mobile health applications.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesBiomedical ResearchDecision Support Systems, ClinicalElectronic Health RecordsSystematized Nomenclature of MedicineHumansClinical terminologyDescription logicElectronic health recordsOntologySNOMED CT

Identifiers

PMID30170591
PMCPMC6119323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.