Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30170496›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2018

Multicenter Study Using Desorption-Electrospray-Ionization-Mass-Spectrometry Imaging for Breast-Cancer Diagnosis.

Andreia M Porcari, Jialing Zhang, Kyana Y Garza, Raquel M Rodrigues-Peres, John Q Lin, Jonathan H Young, Robert Tibshirani, Chandandeep Nagi, Geisilene R Paiva, Stacey A Carter and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Topological segmentation of mass spectrometry imaging data.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prospective on Imaging Mass Spectrometry in Clinical Diagnostics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Promise of spatially resolved omics for tumor research.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Emerging Computational Methods in Mass Spectrometry Imaging.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andreia M PorcariThomson Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry , University of Campinas - UNICAMP , Campinas , São Paulo 13083-970 , Brazil.
Jialing ZhangDepartment of Chemistry , The University of Texas at Austin , Austin , Texas 78712 , United States.
Kyana Y GarzaDepartment of Chemistry , The University of Texas at Austin , Austin , Texas 78712 , United States.
Raquel M Rodrigues-PeresDepartment of Gynecological and Breast Oncology, CAISM Women's Hospital, Faculty of Medical Sciences , University of Campinas , Campinas, São Paulo , 13083-881 , Brazil.
John Q LinDepartment of Chemistry , The University of Texas at Austin , Austin , Texas 78712 , United States.
Jonathan H YoungDepartment of Chemistry , The University of Texas at Austin , Austin , Texas 78712 , United States.
Robert TibshiraniDepartments of Biomedical Data Science and Statistics , Stanford University , Stanford , California 94305 , United States.
Chandandeep NagiDepartment of Pathology and Immunology , Baylor College of Medicine , Houston , Texas 77030 , United States.
Geisilene R PaivaDepartment of Gynecological and Breast Oncology, CAISM Women's Hospital, Faculty of Medical Sciences , University of Campinas , Campinas, São Paulo , 13083-881 , Brazil.
Stacey A CarterDepartment of Surgery , Baylor College of Medicine , Houston , Texas 77030 , United States.
Luis Otávio SarianDepartment of Gynecological and Breast Oncology, CAISM Women's Hospital, Faculty of Medical Sciences , University of Campinas , Campinas, São Paulo , 13083-881 , Brazil.
Marcos N EberlinThomson Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry , University of Campinas - UNICAMP , Campinas , São Paulo 13083-970 , Brazil.
Livia S EberlinDepartment of Chemistry , The University of Texas at Austin , Austin , Texas 78712 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3885-3215
The University of Texas at Austin · USUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRBaylor College of Medicine · USStanford University · US

Funding

Mass Spectrometry Imaging for Clinical Diagnosis and Prognosis of Human CancersR00CA190783 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI SCHIAVINATO EBERLIN, LIVIA · 2016 to 2018
$677k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA190783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The histological and molecular subtypes of breast cancer demand distinct therapeutic approaches. Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) is subtyped according to estrogen-receptor (ER), progesterone-receptor (PR), and HER2 status, among other markers. Desorption-electrospray-ionization-mass-spectrometry imaging (DESI-MSI) is an ambient-ionization MS technique that has been previously used to diagnose IDC. Aiming to investigate the robustness of ambient-ionization MS for IDC diagnosis and subtyping over diverse patient populations and interlaboratory use, we report a multicenter study using DESI-MSI to analyze samples from 103 patients independently analyzed in the United States and Brazil. The lipid profiles of IDC and normal breast tissues were consistent across different patient races and were unrelated to country of sample collection. Similar experimental parameters used in both laboratories yielded consistent mass-spectral data in mass-to-charge ratios ( m/ z) above 700, where complex lipids are observed. Statistical classifiers built using data acquired in the United States yielded 97.6% sensitivity, 96.7% specificity, and 97.6% accuracy for cancer diagnosis. Equivalent performance was observed for the intralaboratory validation set (99.2% accuracy) and, most remarkably, for the interlaboratory validation set independently acquired in Brazil (95.3% accuracy). Separate classification models built for ER and PR statuses as well as the status of their combined hormone receptor (HR) provided predictive accuracies (>89.0%), although low classification accuracies were achieved for HER2 status. Altogether, our multicenter study demonstrates that DESI-MSI is a robust and reproducible technology for rapid breast-cancer-tissue diagnosis and therefore is of value for clinical use.

Indexed as

Molecular ImagingSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansRacial GroupsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID30170496
PMCPMC7433752
OpenAlexW2889270477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.