Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30170468›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2018

Randomized controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of midazolam premedication as an anxiolytic, analgesic, sedative, and hemodynamic stabilizer.

Soeun Jeon, Hyeon-Jeong Lee, Wangseok Do, Hae-Kyu Kim, Jae-Young Kwon, Boo Young Hwang, Jihwan Yun

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Soeun JeonDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Hyeon-Jeong Lee
Wangseok Do
Hae-Kyu Kim
Jae-Young Kwon
Boo Young Hwang
Jihwan Yun
Pusan National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMidazolam premedication is widely used before general anesthesia, but lacks clinical evidence of effectiveness. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of midazolam premedication following 4 aspects: anxiety reduction, sedation, hemodynamic stabilization, and analgesia.

methodsIn a randomized, single-blind, prospective study, a total of 128 women were allocated to the midazolam premedication group (Group P, n = 64) or the control group (Group N, n = 64). The patients were asked to complete the Beck anxiety inventory (BAI) 2 times: on the day before surgery (BS) and 30 minutes after midazolam premedication (T0). Depth of anesthesia using state entropy (SE), conventional hemodynamic data using heart rate (HR) and mean blood pressure (MBP), and analgesic profiles using surgical pleth index (SPI) were acquired at the following 4 points: T1-pre-induction, T2-prior to intubation, T3-intubation, and T4-20 minutes after intubation.

resultsNo change in BAI score was observed between BS and T0 in both groups P and N (median and interquartile range [IQR], Group P: BS-4.5 [2.0-7.0], T0-4.0 [1.0-9.0], P = .603; Group N: BS-4.0 [1.0-8.5], T0-3.5 [1.0-6.0], P = .066). Midazolam premedication reduced SE at T2-4 (mean difference with 95% confidence interval [95% CI], T2-7.1 [1.6-12.6], P = .012; T3-10.4 [6.5-14.4], P < .001; T4-9.2 [5.0-13.4], P < .001). Midazolam premedication also reduced HR (mean differences [95% CI], T1-7.3 [2.5-12.1], P = .003; T3-6.6 [1.1-12.2], P = .020) and MBP at T1 and T3 (mean differences [95% CI], T1-7.3 [2.5-12.1], P = .003; T3-8.6 [1.3-15.9], P = .021), and lowered SPI at T1-3 (mean differences [95% CI]: T1-12.7 [6.1-19.4], P < .001; T2-6.0 [0.5-11.5], P = .033; T3-7.9 [1.7-14.1], P = .012).

conclusionMidazolam premedication did not reduce the level of anxiety. However, midazolam premedication reduced the entropy values, stabilized hemodynamics, and provided analgesia during the induction of anesthesia. The purpose of midazolam premedication needs to be reconsidered.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalgesiaAnxietyFemaleHemodynamicsHumansHypnotics and SedativesMidazolamMiddle AgedPreanesthetic MedicationProspective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultHypnotics and SedativesMidazolam

Identifiers

PMID30170468
PMCPMC6393069
OpenAlexW2889008972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.