Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30170452›Full record

ArticleMedicine2018

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program: Experience with 200 cases from a single Italian center.

Corrado Pedrazzani, Cristian Conti, Guido Mantovani, Eduardo Fernandes, Giulia Turri, Enrico Lazzarini, Nicola Menestrina, Andrea Ruzzenente, Alfredo Guglielmi

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Post-surgical diets in the ERAS protocol: D-ERAS scoping review.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Corrado PedrazzaniDivision of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy Division of Minimally Invasive, General and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Cristian Conti
Guido Mantovani
Eduardo Fernandes
Giulia Turri
Enrico Lazzarini
Nicola Menestrina
Andrea Ruzzenente
Alfredo Guglielmi
University of Verona · ITUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that minimally invasive techniques associated with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols reduce surgery-related stress and promote faster recovery after major colorectal surgery. As a single tertiary referral center for colorectal surgery, our aim was to analyze the effects of our ERAS protocol on a heterogeneous population undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.Prospectively collected data from 283 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection at the Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, between March 2014 and March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients' adherence to pre-, intra-, and postoperative ERAS protocol items together with surgical short-term outcomes such as morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate was considered.The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona (CRINF-1034 CESC).During the study period, 200 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the ERAS protocol. In this series, 34% of patients were aged 70 years or older. Rectal resections represented 26% of all cases, with stoma formation performed in 14.5% of patients. Despite such procedural heterogeneity, good short-term results were obtained: by postoperative day (POD) 2, 58.5% of patients had full return of bowel function, while 63.5% and 88% achieved regular soft diet intake and autonomous walking, respectively. Median (range) length of hospital stay was 5.5 days (2-40) with 71% of patients being discharged by POD 6. No postoperative mortality was recorded, and the rate of major complications was 3.5%. During the study period, 6 patients required redo surgery (3%) and 5 patients required rehospitalization within 30 days (2.5%).This study analyzing the results of the fast-track program in our first 200 cases confirms the feasibility and safety of ERAS protocol application within a heterogeneous population undergoing laparoscopic colonic and rectal resection for benign and malignant diseases.

Indexed as

Program EvaluationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColonColonoscopyFemaleHumansItalyLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative CarePostoperative Period

Identifiers

PMID30170452
PMCPMC6392905
OpenAlexW2889275512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.