Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30170448›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2018

Analysis of trends in usage of analgesics and sedatives in intensive care units of South Korea: A retrospective nationwide population-based study.

Hyuk-Hoon Kim, Sang Chun Choi, Jung Hwan Ahn, Minjung Kathy Chae, Jaesung Heo, Young-Gi Min

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stroke Incidence in Survivors of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning in South Korea: A Population-Based Longitudinal Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hyuk-Hoon KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, 16499, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Sang Chun Choi
Jung Hwan Ahn
Minjung Kathy Chae
Jaesung Heo
Young-Gi Min
Ajou University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of analgesics and sedatives plays an important role in improving patient outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU). Various drugs exist, each with associated differences in patient outcomes; therefore, critical and intensive care medicine societies have developed guidelines for usage of analgesics and sedatives for improved patient outcomes. However, studies investigating drug use in the ICU have been based on surveys administered to medical staff, without accurate insight into the drug use based on prescriptions and behaviors of ICU medical staff, thus failing to demonstrate the actual status of the implementation of these guidelines into clinical practice. Using data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service in South Korea, we analyzed the current use of analgesics and sedatives in ICUs nationally. In addition, we compared the use of analgesics and sedatives in the ICU based on the latest guidelines.We performed a nationwide retrospective study using data available in the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. We included 779,985 patients who had been admitted to the ICU from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014. Descriptive statistics were calculated to analyze the type and frequency of analgesic and sedative use in the ICU, using drug codes for analgesics and sedatives commonly prescribed in the ICU.The most commonly used analgesics and sedatives for all patients admitted to the ICU were pethidine (26.14%) and midazolam (32.18%), respectively. Sedatives and analgesics were more commonly used in mechanically ventilated patients. Among analgesics, the usage rate of pethidine and morphine decreased, whereas the usage rate of fentanyl and remifentanil increased. Among sedatives, the usage rate of benzodiazepine decreased, whereas the usage rate of propofol increased.There was discordance between current usage of analgesics and sedatives and the recommended usage stipulated by ICU guidelines. However, the trend of drug usage is changing to match the guidelines, which recommend maintenance of light sedation using an analgesia-based regimen and usage of short-acting drugs for routine monitoring of pain, agitation, and delirium in ICU care.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnalgesicsDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPainPractice Patterns, Physicians'Republic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAnalgesicsHypnotics and Sedatives

Identifiers

PMID30170448
PMCPMC6392957
OpenAlexW2888834463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.