ArticleMedicine2018
Efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer that failed prior chemotherapy or EGFR-TKIs: A pooled analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI Therapy for EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Five Prospective Clinical Trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of Apatinib in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective trial.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Association BetweenInternational journal of general medicine · 2021Article
- Efficacy and safety of recombinant human endostatin combined with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2020Article
- Review
- Combination of apatinib and docetaxel in treating advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients with wild-type EGFR: a multi-center, phase II trial.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Article
- A phase I dose-reduction study of apatinib combined with pemetrexed and carboplatin in untreated EGFR and ALK negative stage IV non-squamous NSCLC.Investigational new drugs · 2020Article
- Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Apatinib Mesylate in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Patients Who Progressed After Standard Therapy and Analysis of theOncoTargets and therapy · 2020Article
- Traditional Chinese Medicine Prolongs Progression-Free Survival and Enhances Therapeutic Effects in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (EGFR-TKI)Treated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients Harboring EGFR Mutations.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019Article
- Apatinib preferentially inhibits PC9 gefitinib-resistant cancer cells by inducing cell cycle arrest and inhibiting VEGFR signaling pathway.Cancer cell international · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundApatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that selectively inhibits the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. A weighted pooled analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical outcome, efficacy, and toxicity of apatinib in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that failed prior treatment with chemotherapy or epidermal growth factor receptor-TKIs (EGFR-TKIs).
methodsThe literature published in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was searched (from inception to November 30, 2017) for eligible trials using the following search terms: apatinib AND (lung cancer OR NSCLC). Meeting abstracts were also reviewed to identify appropriate studies. Inclusion criteria were as follows: prospective or retrospective studies that evaluated efficacy and/or safety of apatinib in patients with advanced NSCLC that failed prior chemotherapy or EGFR-TKIs; primary outcome included one of these endpoints, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), or adverse events (AEs); English language; and number of cases in the study ≥10 cases.
resultsA total of 457 patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with apatinib in 14 studies (10 retrospective and 4 prospective studies) and were included in this pooled analysis. The pooled median PFS was 4.77 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.11-5.00] in all groups, 4.80 months (95% CI, 4.65-4.95) in the 750 mg apatinib (high-dose) group, and 3.88 months (95% CI, 3.11-4.65) in the 250 to 500 mg apatinib (low-dose) group. Median PFS stratified by single apatinib therapy or apatinib combined with continuous EGFR-TKIs was 4.76 months (95% CI, 3.66-5.06) and 5.20 months (95% CI, 3.66-6.74), respectively. The pooled median OS, ORR, and DCR values were 6.85 months, 18%, and 72%, respectively; pooled median ORR and DCR were 15% and 72% in the 750 mg apatinib group versus 20% and 72% in the 250 to 500 mg apatinib group. ORR and DCR stratified by therapeutic regimens were 14% and 70% for single-agent apatinib, 29% and 88% for apatinib combined with continuous EGFR-TKIs, and 26% and 63% for apatinib combined with chemotherapy, respectively. The pooled AE rates of grade 3/4 were hypertension (7%), proteinuria (3%), hand-foot-skin reaction (6%), fatigue (4%), decreased appetite (1.1%), oral mucositis (3%), and thrombocytopenia (3%).
conclusionApatinib has promising antitumor activity and manageable toxicity profile in patients with advanced NSCLC that failed prior chemotherapy or EGFR-TKIs. This result needs to be confirmed through the ongoing Phase III clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.