Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30170391›Full record

ArticleMedicine2018

Peritoneal dialysis in older adults: Evaluation of clinical, nutritional, metabolic outcomes, and quality of life.

Silvia Lai, Maria I Amabile, Matteo B Bargagli, T Gnerre Musto, Andrea Martinez, Massimo Testorio, Daniela Mastroluca, Carlo Lai, Paola Aceto, Alessio Molfino and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dialysis in the Elderly: A Practical Guide for the Clinician.International journal of nephrology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The significance of follow-up serum uric acid levels in predicting all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Silvia LaiDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome Department of Nephrology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart Department of Obstetrical-GynecologicalSciences and Urologic Sciences Department of Dynamic and Clinic Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care,Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Maria I Amabile
Matteo B Bargagli
T Gnerre Musto
Andrea Martinez
Massimo Testorio
Daniela Mastroluca
Carlo Lai
Paola Aceto
Alessio Molfino
Study Group on Geriatric Nephrology of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN)
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of the Sacred Heart · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of older adults requiring dialysis is increasing worldwide, whereas the use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in this population is lower with respect to younger patients, despite the theoretical advantages of PD respect to hemodialysis. This is most likely due to the concern that older patients may not be able to correctly and safely manage PD.We aimed to prospectively compare clinical, nutritional and metabolic outcomes and measures of quality of life between younger (<65 years old) and older (≥65 years old) patients on PD.PD patients were enrolled and divided into 2 groups according to age (Group A < 65 years, Group B ≥ 65 years). Clinical and instrumental parameters, and quality of life were evaluated at baseline (start of PD) (T0) and at 24 months (T1). Technique survival, mortality, total number of hospitalizations, and the index of peritonitis (episodes of peritonitis/month) were also evaluated.Fifty-one patients starting PD were enrolled. Group A included 22 patients (48.7 ± 8.3 years), and Group B consisted of 29 patients (74.1 ± 6.4 years). At baseline, the 2 groups showed no differences in cognitive status, whereas Group A showed higher total cholesterol (P = .03), LDL (P = .03), and triglycerides (P = .03) levels and lower body mass index (P = .02) and carotid intima media thickness (P < .0001) with respect to Group B. At T1 Group B showed, compared to baseline, a significant reduction in albumin (P < .0001) and phosphorus (P = .045) levels, while no significant differences on body composition, technique survival, total number of hospitalizations, index of peritonitis, and quality of life indices were observed.Our data do not show clinically relevant barriers to use PD in older adult patients, supporting its use in this population. Nutritional and metabolic parameters should be carefully monitored in older PD patients.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAgedBody Mass IndexCarotid Intima-Media ThicknessCholesterolFemaleHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedNutritional StatusPeritoneal DialysisPeritonitisPhosphorusProspective StudiesQuality of LifeCholesterolPhosphorusSerum AlbuminTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID30170391
PMCPMC6393061
OpenAlexW2889315108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.