ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2018
Inter-trial variability in brain activity as an indicator of synergistic effects of HIV-1 and drug abuse.
Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Altered brain activation in uncomplicated pediatric obesity: The second moment is more sensitive than the first.Brain and cognition · 2022Article
- Signal in the noise: Altered brain activation among adolescent alcohol users detected via the analysis of intra-individual variabilityPsychopharmacology · 2022Article
- Inter-trial variability in postural control and brain activation: Effects of previous opiate abuse.Biological psychology · 2022Article
- Temporal instability in brain activation: a novel paradigm for evaluating the maintenance of attention among substance dependent patients.Psychopharmacology · 2021Article
- Neural Responses to Signals for Behavior Change: Greater Within-Person Variability is Associated With Risk Factors for Substance Dependence.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2020Article
- GRM8 genotype is associated with externalizing disorders and greater inter-trial variability in brain activation during a response inhibition task.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this investigation was to detect evidence of the synergism in the effects of HIV-1 and drug abuse on brain function that has been hypothesized but rarely shown. The investigation incorporated several noteworthy improvements in the approach. It used urine toxicology tests to exclude participants complicated by recent methadone use and illicit drug use. Also, it defined drug abuse on a scale that considered symptom severity. Most importantly, it examined inter-trial variability in brain activity as a potentially more sensitive indicator of group differences and functional impairment than the across-trial average.
methods173 participants were assigned to groups defined by their HIV-1 serostatus and Drug Abuse Screening Test score (DAST < vs. > = 6). They completed a simple letter discrimination task including rare target and rare nontarget stimuli. Event-related electroencephalographic responses and key press responses were measured on each trial. During a separate assessment, posturographic measures were recorded.
resultsThe inter-trial standard deviation of P300-like activity was superior to the mean amplitude of this activity in differentiating the groups. Unlike the mean, it revealed synergistic statistical effects of HIV and drug abuse. It also correlated significantly with static ataxia.
conclusionsInter-trial variability in P300-like activity is a useful marker for detecting subtle and episodic disruptions in brain function. It demonstrates greater sensitivity than the mean amplitude for detecting differences across groups. Also, as a putative indicator of a disruption in the attentional monitoring of behavior, it predicts subtle impairments in gross motor function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.