Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30169566›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2019

Valuing the Unpaid Contribution of Community Health Volunteers to Mass Drug Administration Programs.

Hugo C Turner, Jaspreet Toor, Alison A Bettis, Adrian D Hopkins, Shwe Sin Kyaw, Obinna Onwujekwe, Guy E Thwaites, Yoel Lubell, Christopher Fitzpatrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. What are economic costs and when should they be used in health economic studies?Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hugo C TurnerOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Jaspreet ToorLondon Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, St Marys Campus, Imperial College London.
Alison A BettisLondon Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, St Marys Campus, Imperial College London.
Adrian D HopkinsIndependent Consultant, Gravesend, Kent, United Kingdom.
Shwe Sin KyawMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Obinna OnwujekweDepartment of Health Administration and Management, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus.
Guy E ThwaitesOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Yoel LubellCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford.
Christopher FitzpatrickDepartment of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 089276/B/09/7World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community health volunteers (CHVs) are being used within a growing number of healthcare interventions, and they have become a cornerstone for the delivery of mass drug administration within many neglected tropical disease control programs. However, a greater understanding of the methods used to value the unpaid time CHVs contribute to healthcare programs is needed. We outline the two main approaches used to value CHVs' unpaid time (the opportunity cost and the replacement cost approaches). We found that for mass drug administration programs the estimates of the economic costs relating to the CHVs' unpaid time can be significant, with the averages of the different studies varying between US$0.05 and $0.16 per treatment. We estimated that the time donated by CHVs' to the African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control alone would be valued between US$60 and $90 million. There is a need for greater transparency and consistency in the methods used to value CHVs' unpaid time.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersDelivery of Health CareHumansMass Drug AdministrationPublic HealthVolunteersAPOCcommunity volunteerseconomic costsmass drug administrationunpaid work

Identifiers

PMID30169566
PMCPMC6481994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.