Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30169525›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Participant preferences for an Aboriginal-specific fall prevention program: Measuring the value of culturally-appropriate care.

Blake Angell, Tracey Laba, Caroline Lukaszyk, Julieann Coombes, Sandra Eades, Lisa Keay, Rebecca Ivers, Stephen Jan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Blake AngellThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7188-7740
Tracey LabaThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Caroline LukaszykThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Julieann CoombesThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Sandra EadesBaker IDI, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lisa KeayThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Rebecca IversThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Stephen JanThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCulturally-specific services are central to efforts to improve the health of Aboriginal Australians. Few empirical studies have demonstrated the value of such services relative to mainstream alternatives.

objectiveTo assess the preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) of participants for attending a class and the relative importance of transport, cost and cultural-appropriateness in the choices made by participants.

designA discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted alongside a study of a culturally-specific fall-prevention service. Attributes that were assessed were out-of-pocket costs, whether transport was provided and whether the class was Aboriginal-specific. Choices of participants were modelled using panel-mixed logit methods.

results60 patients completed the DCE. Attending a service was strongly preferred over no service (selected 99% of the time). Assuming equivalent efficacy of fall-prevention programs, participants indicated a preference for services that were culturally-specific (OR 1.25 95% CI: 1.00-1.55) and incurred lower out-of-pocket participant costs (OR 1.19 95% CI 1.11-1.27). The provision of transport did not have a statistically significant influence on service choice (p = 0.57). DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsThis represents the first published DCE in the health field examining preferences amongst an Aboriginal population. The results empirically demonstrate the value of the culturally-specific element of a program has to this cohort and the potential that stated-preference methods can have in incorporating the preferences of Aboriginal Australians and valuing cultural components of health services. NOTE ON TERMINOLOGY: As the majority of the NSW Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population is Aboriginal (97.2%), this population will be referred to as 'Aboriginal' in this manuscript.

Indexed as

Culturally Competent CareHealth Services, IndigenousPatient PreferenceAccidental FallsAustraliaChoice BehaviorEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMiddle AgedTransportation of Patients

Identifiers

PMID30169525
PMCPMC6118364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.