Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30169512›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Mosquito excreta: A sample type with many potential applications for the investigation of Ross River virus and West Nile virus ecology.

Ana L Ramírez, Sonja Hall-Mendelin, Stephen L Doggett, Glen R Hewitson, Jamie L McMahon, Scott A Ritchie, Andrew F van den Hurk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Biology and Transmission Dynamics of Aedes flavivirus.Journal of medical entomology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana L RamírezCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4973-4833
Sonja Hall-MendelinPublic Health Virology, Forensic and Scientific Services, Department of Health, Queensland, Australia.
Stephen L DoggettDepartment of Medical Entomology, NSW Health Pathology-ICPMR, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Glen R HewitsonPublic Health Virology, Forensic and Scientific Services, Department of Health, Queensland, Australia.
Jamie L McMahonPublic Health Virology, Forensic and Scientific Services, Department of Health, Queensland, Australia.
Scott A RitchieCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.
Andrew F van den HurkPublic Health Virology, Forensic and Scientific Services, Department of Health, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6262-831X

Funding

EPA EP-C-17-031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmerging and re-emerging arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) cause human and animal disease globally. Field and laboratory investigation of mosquito-borne arboviruses requires analysis of mosquito samples, either individually, in pools, or a body component, or secretion such as saliva. We assessed the applicability of mosquito excreta as a sample type that could be utilized during studies of Ross River and West Nile viruses, which could be applied to the study of other arboviruses. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsMosquitoes were fed separate blood meals spiked with Ross River virus and West Nile virus. Excreta was collected daily by swabbing the bottom of containers containing batches and individual mosquitoes at different time points. The samples were analyzed by real-time RT-PCR or cell culture enzyme immunoassay. Viral RNA in excreta from batches of mosquitoes was detected continuously from day 2 to day 15 post feeding. Viral RNA was detected in excreta from at least one individual mosquito at all timepoints, with 64% and 27% of samples positive for RRV and WNV, respectively. Excretion of viral RNA was correlated with viral dissemination in the mosquito. The proportion of positive excreta samples was higher than the proportion of positive saliva samples, suggesting that excreta offers an attractive sample for analysis and could be used as an indicator of potential transmission. Importantly, only low levels of infectious virus were detected by cell culture, suggesting a relatively low risk to personnel handling mosquito excreta. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Mosquito excreta is easily collected and provides a simple and efficient method for assessing viral dissemination, with applications ranging from vector competence experiments to complementing sugar-based arbovirus surveillance in the field, or potentially as a sample system for virus discovery.

Indexed as

AnimalsCulicidaeFecesRoss River virusWest Nile virus

Identifiers

PMID30169512
PMCPMC6136815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.