Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30169463›Full record

ArticleEar and hearing

Residual Cochlear Function in Adults and Children Receiving Cochlear Implants: Correlations With Speech Perception Outcomes.

Tatyana Elizabeth Fontenot, Christopher Kenneth Giardina, Margaret Dillon, Meredith A Rooth, Holly F Teagle, Lisa R Park, Kevin David Brown, Oliver F Adunka, Craig A Buchman, Harold C Pillsbury and 1 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06375278 (Device to Deliver Intra-Operative Therapeutic Hypothermia for Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06375278 narecruitingnot on this map

Device to Deliver Intra-Operative Therapeutic Hypothermia for Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation

TypeinterventionalSponsorRestorear Devices LLCRan2024 to 2027Enrolled54ConditionsCochlear Implants, Cochlear Implantation, Hearing LossArmsIntra-Ear Canal Cooling Catheter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Users with Residual Acoustic Hearing: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Predictors of Short-Term Changes in Quality of Life after Cochlear Implantation.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2023
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frequency reallocation based on cochlear place frequencies in cochlear implants: a pilot study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  11. Neural Contributions to the Cochlear Summating Potential: Spiking and Dendritic Components.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Light sheet microscopy of the gerbil cochlea.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tatyana Elizabeth FontenotDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Christopher Kenneth GiardinaDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Margaret DillonDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Meredith A RoothDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Holly F TeagleDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Lisa R ParkDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Kevin David BrownDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Oliver F AdunkaDepartment of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Craig A BuchmanDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Harold C PillsburyDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Douglas C FitzpatrickDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USThe Ohio State University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Research Training in OtolaryngologyT32DC005360 · NIDCD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MANIS, PAUL B · 2003 to 2023
$2.8M
Predicting Speech Outcomes and Minimizing Trauma with Cochlear ImplantsF30DC015168 · NIDCD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GIARDINA, CHRISTOPHER · 2016 to 2019
$153k
NIDCD NIH HHS F30 DC015168NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC005360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesVariability in speech perception outcomes with cochlear implants remains largely unexplained. Recently, electrocochleography, or measurements of cochlear potentials in response to sound, has been used to assess residual cochlear function at the time of implantation. Our objective was to characterize the potentials recorded preimplantation in subjects of all ages, and evaluate the relationship between the responses, including a subjective estimate of neural activity, and speech perception outcomes.

designElectrocochleography was recorded in a prospective cohort of 284 candidates for cochlear implant at University of North Carolina (10 months to 88 years of ages). Measurement of residual cochlear function called the "total response" (TR), which is the sum of magnitudes of spectral components in response to tones of different stimulus frequencies, was obtained for each subject. The TR was then related to results on age-appropriate monosyllabic word score tests presented in quiet. In addition to the TR, the electrocochleography results were also assessed for neural activity in the forms of the compound action potential and auditory nerve neurophonic.

resultsThe TR magnitude ranged from a barely detectable response of about 0.02 µV to more than 100 µV. In adults (18 to 79 years old), the TR accounted for 46% of variability in speech perception outcome by linear regression (r = 0.46; p < 0.001). In children between 6 and 17 years old, the variability accounted for was 36% (p < 0.001). In younger children, the TR accounted for less of the variability, 15% (p = 0.012). Subjects over 80 years old tended to perform worse for a given TR than younger adults at the 6-month testing interval. The subjectively assessed neural activity did not increase the information compared with the TR alone, which is primarily composed of the cochlear microphonic produced by hair cells.

conclusionsThe status of the auditory periphery, particularly of hair cells rather than neural activity, accounts for a large fraction of variability in speech perception outcomes in adults and older children. In younger children, the relationship is weaker, and the elderly differ from other adults. This simple measurement can be applied with high throughput so that peripheral status can be assessed to help manage patient expectations, create individually-tailored treatment plans, and identify subjects performing below expectations based on residual cochlear function.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationSpeech PerceptionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAudiometry, Evoked ResponseChildChild, PreschoolCochlear ImplantsCohort StudiesFemaleHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansInfantMale

Identifiers

PMID30169463
PMCPMC6533622
OpenAlexW2889010438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.