Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30169457›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care2018

Dietary vitamin D, vitamin D receptor, and microbiome.

Jun Sun

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jun SunDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

How Vitamin D Receptor Influences Intestinal BarriersR01DK114126 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI Jun Sun · 2018 to 2026
$3.0M
Vitamin D Receptor Regulation of Microbiota in Intestinal EpitheliaR01DK105118 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI SUN, JUN · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK105118NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK114126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe current review is to summarize the recent progress of vitamin D/vitamin D receptor (VDR) and microbiome in intestinal homeostasis, airway function, and other organs. RECENT

findingsMicrobiome is considered as a newly discovered human organ. It is critical in the synthesis of vitamins and harvest of otherwise inaccessible nutrients, metabolism of xenobiotics, body fat storage, renewal of gut epithelial cells, and mature of immune system. Vitamin D and VDR are known to regulate microbiome in health and disease. We will focus on the recent findings published in 12-18 months and discuss the vitamin D supplement and its effects on microbiome, intestinal homeostasis, airway function, and metabolism. We will emphasize the tissue specificity and genetic factor of VDR and microbiome. SUMMARY: The findings in dietary vitamin D, VDR, and microbiome with personalized genetic information will be implicated for optimal prevention and treatment of chronic diseases.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsHomeostasisHumansIntestinesMicrobiotaReceptors, CalcitriolVitamin DVitaminsReceptors, CalcitriolVDR protein, humanVitamin DVitamins

Identifiers

PMID30169457
PMCPMC6168421
OpenAlexW2889499900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.