Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30168741›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2018

Patient-centered Outcomes Research in Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.

Laura C Feemster, Howard L Saft, Susan J Bartlett, Sairam Parthasarathy, Teresa Barnes, Peter Calverley, J Randall Curtis, David H Hickam, Richard A Mularski, David H Au and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Laura C Feemster
Howard L Saft
Susan J Bartlett
Sairam Parthasarathy
Teresa Barnes
Peter Calverley
J Randall Curtis
Richard A MularskiORCID 0000-0001-6979-2542
David H Au
Linda L Chlan
Lynn F Reinke
Christopher E Cox
Eileen Rubin
Smita Shah
Donald R SullivanORCID 0000-0003-3266-3389
American Thoracic Society Behavioral Sciences and Health Services Research Assembly and Nursing Assembly

Funding

Facilitating adoption of COPD evidence-based care in outpatient settings (FACES)K23HL111116 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FEEMSTER, LAURA CECERE · 2013 to 2017
$481k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL111116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) represents a paradigm shift in research methods aimed to create the body of evidence that supports clinical practice and informs health care decisions. PCOR integrates patients and other key stakeholders including family members, policy makers, clinicians, and patient advocates and advocacy groups as research partners throughout all stages of the research process. The importance of PCOR has received increased recognition, yet there is little evidence available to help guide researchers interested in the design and conduct of PCOR. In May 2014, we convened a workshop to identify key issues related to designing, conducting, and disseminating findings from PCOR studies. Workshop participants included a diverse group of patients, patient advocates, clinicians (physicians, nurses, psychologists, and advanced practice providers), researchers, administrators, and funders within and beyond the pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine communities. Participants identified important issues and considerations to address when undertaking PCOR. In this report, we summarize the results of this workshop to inform members of the pulmonary, sleep, and critical care community interested in participating in PCOR. Key findings include the following: 1) requirements for research to be considered PCOR; 2) the potential significant impact of PCOR on patients, clinicians, and researchers; 3) guiding principles and practical strategies to form successful patient-centered research partnerships, conduct PCOR, and disseminate study results to a broad audience of stakeholders; 4) benefits and challenges of PCOR for researchers; and 5) resources available within the American Thoracic Society to help with the conduct of PCOR.

Indexed as

Critical CarePatient Outcome AssessmentPulmonary MedicineSleep Medicine SpecialtyEducationHumansSocieties, Medicalcritical carepatient-centered outcomes researchpulmonary medicinesleep medicine

Identifiers

PMID30168741
PMCPMC6850728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.