Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30168711›Full record

ArticleACS sensors2018

Influence of Fluorescent Protein Maturation on FRET Measurements in Living Cells.

Boqun Liu, Sara N Mavrova, Jonas van den Berg, Sebastian K Kristensen, Luca Mantovanelli, Liesbeth M Veenhoff, Bert Poolman, Arnold J Boersma

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS sensors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Decoding mEos4b day-long maturation and engineering fast-maturing variants.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Liposome-EncapsulatedACS synthetic biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. High Macromolecular Crowding in Liposomes from Microfluidics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  12. SystematicACS synthetic biology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Boqun LiuDepartment of Biochemistry, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute , University of Groningen , Nijenborgh 4 , 9747 AG Groningen , The Netherlands.
Sara N MavrovaDepartment of Biochemistry, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute , University of Groningen , Nijenborgh 4 , 9747 AG Groningen , The Netherlands.
Jonas van den BergDepartment of Biochemistry, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute , University of Groningen , Nijenborgh 4 , 9747 AG Groningen , The Netherlands.
Sebastian K KristensenDepartment of Biochemistry, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute , University of Groningen , Nijenborgh 4 , 9747 AG Groningen , The Netherlands.
Luca MantovanelliDepartment of Biochemistry, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute , University of Groningen , Nijenborgh 4 , 9747 AG Groningen , The Netherlands.
Liesbeth M VeenhoffEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing , University of Groningen , University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen , The Netherlands.
Bert PoolmanDepartment of Biochemistry, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute , University of Groningen , Nijenborgh 4 , 9747 AG Groningen , The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1455-531X
Arnold J BoersmaDepartment of Biochemistry, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute , University of Groningen , Nijenborgh 4 , 9747 AG Groningen , The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3714-5938

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based sensors are a valuable tool to quantify cell biology, yet it remains necessary to identify and prevent potential artifacts in order to exploit their full potential. We show here that artifacts arising from slow donor mCerulean3 maturation can be substantially diminished by constitutive expression in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, which can also be achieved by incorporation of faster-maturing FRET donors. We developed an improved version of the donor mTurquoise2 that matures faster than the parent protein. Our analysis shows that using equal maturing fluorophores in FRET-based sensors or using constitutive low expression conditions helps to reduce maturation-induced artifacts, without the need of additional noise-inducing spectral corrections. In general, we show that monitoring and controlling the maturation of fluorescent proteins in living cells is important and should be addressed in in vivo applications of genetically encoded FRET sensors.

Indexed as

Base SequenceCell Physiological PhenomenaChloramphenicolEscherichia coliFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferGene Expression RegulationGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMaltose-Binding ProteinsMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, FluorescenceModels, BiologicalMutationPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein Synthesis InhibitorsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeChloramphenicolGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMaltose-Binding ProteinsProtein Synthesis Inhibitorsbiosensorsfluorescent protein maturationFörster resonance energy transferFRET sensorsmacromolecular crowding

Identifiers

PMID30168711
PMCPMC6167724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.