ReviewCell transplantation2019
Narcotic Addiction in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.
Review in Cell transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterizing a new rat model of chronic pain after spine surgery.Bone research · 2025Article
- Catastrophizing as a Predictor for Pain Perception and Disability Among Patients Undergoing Spinal Cord Stimulation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Orthopaedic Surgery: Opioids or Not Opioids?Journal of pain research · 2025Review
- Trends in the prescription of opioids and gabapentinoids in patients with failed back surgery syndrome in Korea: a population-based study.The Korean journal of pain · 2024Article
- Chronic pain after spine surgery: Insights into pathogenesis, new treatment, and preventive therapy.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2023Review
- Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: No Longer a Surgeon's Defeat-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Impact of erector spinae plane block on the quality of recovery after lumbar spine decompression surgery: A comparative study between addicts and non-addicts.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
- Circular RNA and intervertebral disc degeneration: unravelling mechanisms and implications.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Review
- Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Spinal Cord Stimulation vs Conventional Therapy in the Management of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.Journal of pain research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Back pain is a common health problem that reduces the quality of life for human beings worldwide. Several treatment modalities have been reported as effective for pain relief. Generally, patients often undergo surgical interventions as pain becomes intractable, after conservative treatment. With advances in surgical techniques, those choosing spinal surgery as an option have increased over time, and instrumentation is more popular than it was years ago. However, some patients still have back pain after spinal operations. The number of patients classified as having failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) has increased over time as has the requirement for patients receiving long-term analgesics. Because pain relief is regarded as a human right, narcotics were prescribed more frequently than before. Narcotic addiction in patients with FBSS has become an important issue. Here, we review the prevalence of FBSS, the mechanism of narcotic addiction, and their correlations. Additionally, several potentially effective strategies for the prevention and treatment of narcotic addiction in FBSS patients are evaluated and discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.