Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30168205›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2018

A comparison of coil combination strategies in 3D multi-channel MRSI reconstruction for patients with brain tumors.

Maryam Vareth, Janine Lupo, Peder Larson, Sarah Nelson

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. HyperpolarizedNMR in biomedicine · 2021
    Article
  4. Accelerated J-resolvedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. First hyperpolarized [2-Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maryam VarethUC Berkeley-UCSF Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7827-2570
Janine LupoUC Berkeley-UCSF Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0051-6387
Peder LarsonUC Berkeley-UCSF Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4183-3634
Sarah NelsonUC Berkeley-UCSF Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Project 4: Multi-modality Metabolic Imaging for Monitoring Molecular Sub-types of GliomaP01CA118816 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Pavithra Viswanath · 2007 to 2026
$44.7M
MR Metabolic Markers for Evaluation of Patients with Recurrent GliomaR01CA127612 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LI, YAN · 2008 to 2017
$3.8M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA118816NCI NIH HHS R01 CA127612NIH HHS P01 CA118816NIH HHS R01 CA127612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was to find the most robust algorithm for a phase-sensitive coil combination of 3D single-cycle and lactate-edited, multi-channel H-1 point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) localized echo planar spectroscopic imaging (EPSI) data for clinical applications in the brain. Data were acquired over 5-10 minutes at 3T using 8- or 32-channel array coils. Peak referencing with residual water and N-acetyl-aspartate, first-point phasing, generalized least squared (GLS) and whitened singular-value decomposition (WSVD) combination algorithms were evaluated relative to unsuppressed water with data from a phantom, six volunteers and 55 patients with brain tumors. Comparison metrics were signal-to-noise ratio, coefficient of variance and percent signal increase. Where residual water was present, using it as a reference peak for phasing and weighting factors from an imaging calibration scan gave the best overall performance. Greater improvement was seen for large selected volumes (>720 cm

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLactatesMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleMiddle AgedPhantoms, ImagingSignal-To-Noise RatioWaterLactatesWatercoil combination techniquesfirst-point phasingGLSlactate editingmultichannel EPSIpeak referencingPRESS localizationWSVD

Identifiers

PMID30168205
PMCPMC6290901
OpenAlexW2897999118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.