ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2019
A SimpleProbe
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Histopathological Myocardial Changes and CPV-2 DNA Detection in Young Dogs: A Retrospective Study.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Colloidal gold and fluorescent immunochromatographic test strips for canine parvovirus detection.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Article
- The Changes in Canine Parvovirus Variants over the Years.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- The first evaluation of the effectiveness of canine vaccination schedule by two commercial vaccines in Iran.BMC veterinary research · 2022Article
- A novel one-step amplification refractory mutation system PCR (ARMS-PCR) for differentiation of canine parvovirus-2 variants.Virus genes · 2021Article
- An Improved Polymerase Cross-Linking Spiral Reaction Assay for Rapid Diagnostic of Canine Parvovirus 2 Infection.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Article
- Article
- Molecular epidemiology of canine parvovirus type 2 in Vietnam from November 2016 to February 2018.Virology journal · 2019Article
- A SimpleProbeJournal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCanine parvovirus type 2 (CPV-2) causes an important canine viral disease worldwide. CPV-2 belongs to the Protoparvovirus genus in the family Parvoviridae. An amino acid change at position 426 of the VP2 protein differentiate types of CPV-2, designated as CPV-2a (Asn), CPV-2b (Asp), and CPV-2c (Glu). In this study, we compared CPV-2 genotyping results obtained by SimpleProbe
methodsOne hundred rectal swabs were collected from CPV-2 naturally infected dogs from 2015 to 2017 at the Animal Disease Diagnostic Center, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology. CPV-2 genotyping was performed by SimpleProbe
resultsCPV-2a (n = 23), 2b (n = 6) and 2c (n = 71) genotyping results obtained by both techniques were identical with specificity of 100% for SimpleProbe
conclusionThis study developed a novel method for genotyping CPV-2 strains using the SimpleProbe
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.