Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30167937›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2018

Cancer survivors not participating in observational patient-reported outcome studies have a lower survival compared to participants: the population-based PROFILES registry.

Belle H de Rooij, Nicole P M Ezendam, Floortje Mols, Pauline A J Vissers, Melissa S Y Thong, Carla C P Vlooswijk, Simone Oerlemans, Olga Husson, Nicole J E Horevoorts, Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Gastrointestinal symptom profiles after resection of esophageal or gastric cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Do non-responders of a geriatric screening questionnaire face lower one-year survival compared to responders? A retrospective cohort study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Predicting health-related quality of life two years post-diagnosis across seven cancer types: using machine learning to identify vulnerable patients.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Getting valuable and valid insight in life after ICU: evaluating the representativeness of a large cohort of ICU survivors.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Development of a prediction model for clinically-relevant fatigue: a multi-cancer approach.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Belle H de RooijDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands. b.h.derooij@uvt.nl.
Nicole P M EzendamDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Floortje MolsDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Pauline A J VissersThe Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Melissa S Y ThongDepartment of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Carla C P VlooswijkThe Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Simone OerlemansThe Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Olga HussonDepartment of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nicole J E HorevoortsDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Lonneke V van de Poll-FranseDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 480-08-009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe 'Patient Reported Outcomes Following Initial treatment and Long-term Evaluation of Survivorship' (PROFILES) registry collects patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from short- and long-term cancer survivors in the Netherlands, in a population-based setting. The aim of this analysis is to assess the generalizability of observational PRO research among cancer survivors by comparing socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, and survival of participants and non-participants in cancer survivors invited for questionnaire research through the PROFILES registry.

methodsBetween 2008 and 2015, cancer survivors with different cancer diagnoses (N = 14,011) were invited to participate in PROFILES registry studies, of whom 69% (N = 9684) participated. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics and survival data, collected through the Netherlands Cancer Registry, were associated with participation versus non-participation in multivariable logistic regression analyses and cox proportional hazard regression models, respectively.

resultsParticipants had a significantly better survival compared to non-participants (HR = 1.47, P < .01). Participation was associated with male gender, being 60-70 years old, high socio-economic status, receiving any treatment, receiving radiotherapy, having no comorbidities, and a cancer diagnosis 2-3 years before invitation. Sensitivity analysis demonstrates that the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) might be up to 1.3 points lower (scale 0-100) using hot deck imputation compared to non-imputed participant data.

conclusionsCancer survivors not participating in observational PROs research significantly differ from participants, with respect to socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, and survival. Their HRQoL scores may be systematically lower compared to participants. Therefore, even in PRO studies with relatively high participation rates, observed outcomes may represent the healthier patient with better outcomes.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAgedAged, 80 and overCancer SurvivorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRegistriesSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvival RateCancer survivorsNon-participationNon-response biasPatient-reported outcomesQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID30167937
PMCPMC6244797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.