Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30167888›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2018

Prognostic impact of hyperdiploidy in multiple myeloma patients with high-risk cytogenetics: a pilot study in China.

Jiangang Mei, Yongping Zhai, Hanqing Li, Feng Li, Xiaogang Zhou, Ping Song, Qian Zhao, Yaping Yu, Zhiming An, Liping Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jiangang MeiLaboratory of Haematology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7690-5699
Yongping ZhaiDepartment of Haematology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China. yongpingzhai@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7711-7210
Hanqing LiLaboratory of Haematology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Feng LiDepartment of Haematology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Xiaogang ZhouDepartment of Haematology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Ping SongDepartment of Haematology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Qian ZhaoDepartment of Haematology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Yaping YuDepartment of Haematology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Zhiming AnDepartment of Haematology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Liping WangDepartment of Haematology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

Nanjing General Hospital Research Foundation Project No. 2016024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMultiple myeloma is genetically heterogeneous with varied clinical outcomes, primarily due to the coexistence of diverse numerical and structural cytogenetic abnormalities. The prognostic impact of hyperdiploidy in myeloma patients with high-risk cytogenetics remains controversial in Western studies and is unknown in China.

methodsWe examined the cytogenetic features of hyperdiploidy in 201 Chinese patients with newly diagnosed myeloma using magnetic-activated cell sorting and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization and analyzed the effect of hyperdiploidy on the prognosis of patients with high-risk cytogenetics.

resultsHyperdiploidy was detected in 50.7% (102/201) of the examined patients, and the incidence of hyperdiploidy coexisting with high-risk cytogenetics [del(17p13), +1q21 and adverse t(14q32)] was 33.8% (68/201). Survival analysis showed that the median progression-free survival (PFS) and 2-year overall survival (OS) of patients were better for hyperdiploidy than those for non-hyperdiploidy (43 vs. 20 months, P = 0.01; 86.8% vs. 70.5%, P = 0.04) and for standard-risk cytogenetics than those for high-risk cytogenetics (not reached vs. 23 months, P = 0.0001; 87.6% vs. 74.4%, P = 0.01). Strikingly, the high-risk cytogenetics patients with hyperdiploidy showed a better median PFS than those without hyperdiploidy (34 vs. 15 months, P = 0.01); however, compared to standard-risk cytogenetics patients, the median PFS and 2-year OS were poorer (34 months vs. not reached, P = 0.02; 78.8% vs. 87.6%, P = 0.05). The independent predictors of PFS were non-hyperdiploidy, high-risk cytogenetics, and bone marrow plasma cells ≥ 30%, with hazard ratios of 2.01 (95% CI 1.25-3.25), 2.56 (95% CI 1.38-4.74), and 1.81 (95% CI 1.08-3.05), respectively, and those for OS were non-hyperdiploidy and serum lactate dehydrogenase ≥ 250 U/L, with hazard ratios of 2.53 (95% CI 1.24-5.46) and 3.53 (95% CI 1.50-6.96), respectively.

conclusionsThese results suggest that the coexistence of hyperdiploidy may ameliorate the adverse prognosis of multiple myeloma patients with high-risk cytogenetics. High-risk cytogenetics patients without hyperdiploidy showed the worst prognosis.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsDiploidyPolyploidyAgedAsian PeopleChinaFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaPilot ProjectsPrognosisRisk FactorsHigh-risk cytogeneticsHyperdiploidyMultiple myelomaPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID30167888
PMCPMC11813433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.