Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30167887›Full record

ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2018

Austrian consensus guidelines on imaging requirements prior to hepatic surgery and during follow-up in patients with malignant hepatic lesions.

Dietmar Tamandl, Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah, Gernot Böhm, Klaus Emmanuel, Rosemarie Forstner, Reinhold Függer, Benjamin Henninger, Oliver Koch, Claus Kölblinger, Hans-Jörg Mischinger and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Dietmar TamandlDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. dietmar.tamandl@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1996-0688
Ahmed Ba-SsalamahDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Gernot BöhmDepartment of Radiology, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria.
Klaus EmmanuelDepartment of Surgery, Uniklinikum Salzburg, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Rosemarie ForstnerDepartment of Radiology, Uniklinikum Salzburg, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Reinhold FüggerDepartment of Surgery, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria.
Benjamin HenningerDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Oliver KochDepartment of Surgery, Uniklinikum Salzburg, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Claus KölblingerDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Barmherzige Schwestern Ried, Ried im Innkreis, Austria.
Hans-Jörg MischingerDepartment of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Wolfgang SchimaDepartment of Radiology, Göttlicher Heiland Hospital, Barmherzige Schwestern Hospital and Sankt Josef Hospital, Vinzenzgruppe, Vienna, Austria.
Helmut SchöllnastDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Stefan StättnerDepartment of Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Klaus KaczirekDepartment of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. klaus.kaczirek@meduniwien.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid advances in imaging technology have improved the detection, characterization and staging of colorectal liver metastases, hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. A variety of imaging modalities are available and play a pivotal role in the work-up of patients, particularly as imaging findings determine resectability. Surgery often represents the only measure that can render long-term survival possible. Imaging is also indispensable for the assessment of responses to neoadjuvant treatment and for the detection of recurrence. At a consensus meeting held in June 2017 in Vienna, Austria, Austrian experts in the fields of surgery and radiology discussed imaging requirements prior to and after hepatic surgery for malignant liver lesions. This consensus was refined by online voting on a total of 47 items. Generally, the degree of consensus was high. The recommendations relate to the type of preferred preoperative imaging modalities, technical settings with respect to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, use of contrast agents, reporting, postoperative follow-up, and long-term follow-up. Taking local resources into account, these consensus recommendations can be implemented in daily clinical practice at specialized centers as well as outpatient diagnostic institutes in Austria.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsAustriaFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalCholangiocarcinomaColorectal liver metastasesHepatic surgeryHepatocellular carcinomaImaging

Identifiers

PMID30167887
PMCPMC6244807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.