Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30167851›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2019

Fatty acids from dairy and meat and their association with risk of coronary heart disease.

Linda E T Vissers, Jonna Rijksen, Jolanda M A Boer, W M Monique Verschuren, Yvonne T van der Schouw, Ivonne Sluijs

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linda E T VissersJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STRT 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9044-0744
Jonna RijksenJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STRT 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jolanda M A BoerNational institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
W M Monique VerschurenJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STRT 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Yvonne T van der SchouwJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STRT 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ivonne SluijsJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STRT 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. I.Sluijs-2@umcutrecht.nl.
Utrecht University · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NL

Funding

Hartstichting 2015T019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe relationship of total, saturated, mono-unsaturated and poly-unsaturated fatty acids (SFA, MUFA, PUFA) with coronary heart disease (CHD) is debated. We hypothesized that the association of dairy-derived FA with CHD may be different than the association of meat-derived FA with CHD. We therefore aimed to directly compare association of FA intakes from dairy and meat with risk of CHD using substitution models.

methodsBaseline (1993-1997) FA intake was measured using a validated food frequency questionnaire among 35,767 participants from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Netherlands cohort (EPIC-NL). Incident CHD events (n = 2374) were obtained through linkage with national registries during a mean follow-up of 15 years. Association of FA from dairy substituted with FA from meat with CHD risk was estimated through multivariable Cox regression.

resultsParticipants consumed 81.9 (SD 28.7) grams of FA per day, of which 17.9 (SD 5.2) was from dairy and 15.3 (SD 9.5) from meat. Substituting 1 en% of dairy-derived SFA with meat-derived SFA was associated with higher CHD risk (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.10), but substituting dairy-derived MUFA or PUFA did not (HR

conclusionsOur modelling suggests that substituting dairy SFA with meat SFA is associated with a higher risk of CHD, but substituting dairy MUFA or PUFA with meat FA is not. These results need to be replicated in other cohorts with different fat intakes, preferably with larger variation in the intake of MUFA and PUFA from dairy and meat.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCohort StudiesCoronary DiseaseDairy ProductsDietDietary FatsFatty AcidsFemaleHumansMaleMeatMiddle AgedNetherlandsProspective StudiesRegistriesDietary FatsFatty AcidsDairyFatty acidsMeatProspectiveReplacementSubstitution

Identifiers

PMID30167851
PMCPMC6768909
OpenAlexW2888895090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.