Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30167812›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Machine Learning-Based Quantitative Computed Tomography Texture Analysis for Prediction of Fuhrman Nuclear Grade.

Ceyda Turan Bektas, Burak Kocak, Aytul Hande Yardimci, Mehmet Hamza Turkcanoglu, Ugur Yucetas, Sevim Baykal Koca, Cagri Erdim, Ozgur Kilickesmez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Kidney medicine meets computer vision: a bibliometric analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2024
    Article
  20. Review

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ceyda Turan BektasDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Burak KocakDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. drburakkocak@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7307-396X
Aytul Hande YardimciDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet Hamza TurkcanogluDepartment of Radiology, Batman Women and Children's Health Training and Research Hospital, Batman, Turkey.
Ugur YucetasDepartment of Urology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sevim Baykal KocaDepartment of Pathology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cagri ErdimDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ozgur KilickesmezDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bakırköy Psychiatric Hospital · TRBatman University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the performance of quantitative computed tomography (CT) texture analysis using different machine learning (ML) classifiers for discriminating low and high nuclear grade clear cell renal cell carcinomas (cc-RCCs). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study included 53 patients with pathologically proven 54 cc-RCCs (31 low-grade [grade 1 or 2]; 23 high-grade [grade 3 or 4]). In one patient, two synchronous cc-RCCs were included in the analysis. Mean age was 57.5 years. Thirty-four (64.1%) patients were male and 19 were female (35.9%). Mean tumour size based on the maximum diameter was 57.4 mm (range, 16-145 mm). Forty patients underwent radical nephrectomy and 13 underwent partial nephrectomy. Following pre-processing steps, two-dimensional CT texture features were extracted using portal-phase contrast-enhanced CT. Reproducibility of texture features was assessed with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Nested cross-validation with a wrapper-based algorithm was used in feature selection and model optimisation. The ML classifiers were support vector machine (SVM), multilayer perceptron (MLP, a sort of neural network), naïve Bayes, k-nearest neighbours, and random forest. The performance of the classifiers was compared by certain metrics.

resultsAmong 279 texture features, 241 features with an ICC equal to or higher than 0.80 (excellent reproducibility) were included in the further feature selection process. The best model was created using SVM. The selected subset of features for SVM included five co-occurrence matrix (ICC range, 0.885-0.998), three run-length matrix (ICC range, 0.889-0.992), one gradient (ICC = 0.998), and four Haar wavelet features (ICC range, 0.941-0.997). The overall accuracy, sensitivity (for detecting high-grade cc-RCCs), specificity (for detecting high-grade cc-RCCs), and overall area under the curve of the best model were 85.1%, 91.3%, 80.6%, and 0.860, respectively.

conclusionsThe ML-based CT texture analysis can be a useful and promising non-invasive method for prediction of low and high Fuhrman nuclear grade cc-RCCs. KEY POINTS: • Based on the percutaneous biopsy literature, ML-based CT texture analysis has a comparable predictive performance with percutaneous biopsy. • Highest predictive performance was obtained with use of the SVM. • SVM correctly classified 85.1% of cc-RCCs in terms of nuclear grade, with an AUC of 0.860.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningAdultAgedBayes TheoremBiopsyCarcinoma, Renal CellData CollectionDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNephrectomyReproducibility of ResultsArtificial intelligenceClear cell renal cell carcinomaFuhrman nuclear gradeMachine learningMultidetector computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID30167812
OpenAlexW2889301685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.