Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30167811›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

MR imaging based fractal analysis for differentiating primary CNS lymphoma and glioblastoma.

Shuai Liu, Xing Fan, Chuanbao Zhang, Zheng Wang, Shaowu Li, Yinyan Wang, Xiaoguang Qiu, Tao Jiang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shuai LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 6, Tiantan Xili, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
Xing FanBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chuanbao ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 6, Tiantan Xili, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
Zheng WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 6, Tiantan Xili, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
Shaowu LiBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yinyan WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 6, Tiantan Xili, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
Xiaoguang QiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 6, Tiantan Xili, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100050, China. ttyy6611@sina.com.
Tao JiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 6, Tiantan Xili, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100050, China. taojiang1964@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7008-6351
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

Beijing Postdoctoral Research Foundation 2017-ZZ-116Capital Medical Development Research Fund 2016-2-1073National Key Research and Development Plan No. 2016YFC0902500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to differentiate primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) from glioblastomas (GBM) using the fractal analysis of conventional MRI data. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty patients with PCNSL and 107 patients with GBM with MRI data available were enrolled. Fractal dimension (FD) and lacunarity values of the tumour region were calculated using fractal analysis. A predictive model combining fractal parameters and anatomical characteristics was built using logistic regression. The role of FD, lacunarity and the predictive model in differential diagnosis was evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The association between fractal parameters and anatomical characteristics of tumours was also investigated.

resultsPCNSL had lower FD values (p < 0.001) and higher lacunarity values (p < 0.001) than GBM. ROC curve analysis revealed that FD, lacunarity, and the predictive model could distinguish PCNSL from GBM (area under the curve: 0.895, 0.776, and 0.969, respectively). The following associations were observed between fractal parameters and anatomical characteristics: multiple lesions were significantly associated with higher lacunarity (p = 0.024), necrosis with higher FD (p = 0.027), corpus callosum involvement with higher lacunarity (p < 0.001) in PCNSL and subventricular zone involvement with higher FD (p < 0.001) in GBM.

conclusionsThe findings of the study indicate that fractal analysis on conventional MRI performs well in distinguishing PCNSL from GBM. KEY POINTS: • Fractal dimension and lacunarity were capable of differentiating PCNSL from GBM. • PCNSL and GBM exhibited different anatomical characteristics. • Fractal parameters were associated with some of these anatomical characteristics.

Indexed as

FractalsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsCorpus CallosumDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGlioblastomaHumansLymphomaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveDiagnosisFractalsGlioblastomaLymphomaMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID30167811
OpenAlexW2889218721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.