Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30167756›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2018

The role of solute carrier (SLC) transporters in actinomycin D pharmacokinetics in paediatric cancer patients.

Hannah Yejin Kim, Gareth J Veal, Fanfan Zhou, Alan V Boddy

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00900354 (Pharmacokinetics of Actinomycin D in Children With Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00900354 unknown statusnot on this map

Pharmacokinetics of Actinomycin D in Children With Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorChildren's Cancer and Leukaemia GroupRan2006Enrolled50ConditionsUnspecified Childhood Solid Tumor, Protocol SpecificArmsmolecular genetic technique, mass spectrometry, pharmacological study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hannah Yejin KimSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. hkim0212@uni.sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1808-5036
Gareth J VealNorthern Institute of Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle, Tyne, UK.
Fanfan ZhouSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Alan V BoddySchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUInstitute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C19528/A10895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundActinomycin D is used for treatment of paediatric cancers; however, a large inter-patient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability and hepatotoxicity are significant limitations to its use and warrant further investigation. Elimination of actinomycin D may be mediated by transporters, as the drug does not seem to undergo significant metabolism. We investigated the role of solute carrier (SLC) transporters in actinomycin D PK.

methodsFourteen key SLCs were screened through probe substrate uptake inhibition by actinomycin D in HEK293 cells. Uptake of actinomycin D was further studied in candidate SLCs by measuring intracellular actinomycin D using a validated LCMS assay. Pharmacogenetic analysis was conducted for 60 patients (Clinical trial: NCT00900354), who were genotyped for SNPs for OAT4 and PEPT2.

resultsOAT4, OCT2, OCT3 and PEPT2 showed significantly lower probe substrate uptake (mean ± SD 75.0 ± 3.5% (p < 0.0001), 74.8 ± 11.2% (p = 0.001), 81.2 ± 14.0% (p = 0.0083) and 70.7 ± 5.7% (p = 0.0188)) compared to that of control. Intracellular accumulation of actinomycin D was greater compared to vector control in OAT4-transfected cells by 1.5- and 1.4-fold at 10 min (p = 0.01) and 20 min (p = 0.03), and in PEPT2-transfected cells by 1.5- and 1.7-fold at 10 min (p = 0.047) and 20 min (p = 0.043), respectively. Subsequent clinical study did not find a significant association between OAT4 rs11231809 and PEPT2 rs2257212 genotypes, and actinomycin D PK parameters such as clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V

conclusionTransport of actinomycin D was mediated by OAT4 and PEPT2 in vitro. There was a lack of clinical significance of OAT4 and PEPT2 genotypes as predictors of actinomycin D disposition in paediatric cancer patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBiological TransportCarrier ProteinsChildChild, PreschoolDactinomycinGenotypeHEK293 CellsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNegative ResultsNeoplasmsOrganic Anion Transporters, Sodium-IndependentPharmacogeneticsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticCarrier ProteinsDactinomycinhydrogen-coupled oligopeptide transporter PepT2Organic Anion Transporters, Sodium-IndependentSLC22A11 protein, humanSymportersActinomycin DCancerPharmacogeneticsPharmacokineticsSLC transporters

Identifiers

PMID30167756
OpenAlexW2888811742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.