Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30167752›Full record

Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019

Posterior capsule injection of local anesthetic for post-operative pain control after ACL reconstruction: a prospective, randomized trial.

Robert A Keller, Michael E Birns, Adam C Cady, Orr Limpisvasti, Michael B Banffy

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. A comparison of postoperative pain between anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and repair.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert A KellerAscension Crittenton Hospital, 1101 W. University Rd, Rochester, MI, 48307, USA. Robkeller23@gmail.com.
Michael E BirnsPremier Orthopaedics, 2004 Sproul Road, Broomall, PA, 19008, USA.
Adam C CadyKerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, 6801 Park Terrace Dr, Los Angeles, CA, 90045, USA.
Orr LimpisvastiKerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, 6801 Park Terrace Dr, Los Angeles, CA, 90045, USA.
Michael B BanffyKerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, 6801 Park Terrace Dr, Los Angeles, CA, 90045, USA.
Cedars-Sinai Kerlan-Jobe Institute · USCrittenton Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlternative modalities to optimize pain control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are continually being explored. The purpose of this study was to compare femoral nerve block (FNB) only vs FNB with posterior capsule injection (PCI) of the knee for pain control in patients undergoing ACLR.

methodsPatients undergoing primary ACLR were randomized to receive either FNB only or FNB with PCI. Following surgery, patient's pain was evaluated in the postoperative care unit (PACU) and at home for 4 days. Pain levels were measured via visual analog scale (VAS) and calculating opioid consumption. Outcomes of interest included postoperative pain levels and opioid consumption.

resultsA total of 42 patients were evaluated, with 21 patients randomized to each study arm. Outcomes showed significant pain reduction in both anterior and posterior knee VAS scores in the PACU in those that received PCI (anterior VAS: 39.6 vs 21.3 (SD = 12.9), p < 0.01; posterior VAS: 25.4 vs 15.3 (SD = 8.05), p = 0.01). Moreover, the PCI group also showed significantly less opioid consumption compared to FNB only (23.5 vs 17.4 pills, p = 0.03). There were no differences found in pain scores between groups in home VAS sores.

conclusionsThese finding suggest the use of arthroscopically assisted injection of local anesthetic to the posterior capsule of the knee significantly reduces early post-operative pain and dramatically reduces the number of opoid medication taken after ACLR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective, randomized, control trial, Level I.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionInjections, Intra-ArticularNerve BlockAdultAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalArthroscopyBupivacaineFemaleFemoral NerveHumansJoint CapsuleKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PainAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineACLAnterior cruciate ligamentPain controlReconstruction

Identifiers

PMID30167752
OpenAlexW2888784753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.