Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30167713›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2019

Feasibility of radiotherapy in nonagenarian patients: a retrospective study.

L Kocik, H Geinitz, C Track, M Geier, C Nieder

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prospective trial on telemonitoring of geriatric cancer patients using handheld devices.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Factors affecting radiotherapy utilisation in geriatric oncology patients in NSW, Australia.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2020
    Article
  8. Radiotherapy of the oldest old-feasibility and institutional analysis.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

L KocikDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010, Linz, Austria. lukas.kocik@ordensklinikum.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9568-5142
H GeinitzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010, Linz, Austria.
C TrackDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010, Linz, Austria.
M GeierDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010, Linz, Austria.
C NiederDepartment of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital Trust, 8092, Bodø, Norway.
Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern · ATNordland Hospital Trust · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSpecific information about radiation therapy in nonagenarians is limited. In order to shed more light on the feasibility of radiotherapy in this challenging subgroup, a retrospective study was performed.

methodsThe data of 93 consecutive patients receiving irradiation treatment at the Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern between June 2005 and December 2016 were analyzed. Patient- and treatment-related factors were extracted from the patient records. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from irradiation to death or last follow-up. The survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

resultsThe study population of 93 patients was between 90 and 99 years old (median 91 years). It included 59 women (63%) and 34 men (37%). Of these, 38 (41%) received definitive radiotherapy, 14 (15%) received neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiotherapy, whereas a palliative regimen was prescribed in 44% of the cases (n = 41). In all, 79 patients (85%) were able to complete their prescribed course of radiotherapy. While 16 (17%) patients reported grade 2 toxicities or higher, 4 had ≥grade 3 side effects (4%). The median survival was significantly higher in patients treated with adjuvant, neoadjuvant or definitive radiotherapy (13.8 months) compared to patients treated with palliative radiotherapy (3.6 months; p < 0.001).

conclusionEven in patients managed without preradiotherapy comprehensive geriatric assessment, carefully planned fractionated radiotherapy was feasible and resulted in acceptable rates of acute toxicities.

Indexed as

Aged, 80 and overAge FactorsDose Fractionation, RadiationFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGeriatric AssessmentHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasmsPalliative CareRadiotherapy, AdjuvantSurvival RateAged, 80 and overDose FractionationGeriatric assessmentRadiation OncologySurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID30167713
OpenAlexW2889218550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.