Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30167667›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2018

An Application of Network Science to Phonological Sequence Learning in Children With Developmental Language Disorder.

Sara Benham, Lisa Goffman, Richard Schweickert

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Not All Procedural Learning Tasks Are Difficult for Adults With Developmental Language Disorder.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara BenhamSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas.
Lisa GoffmanSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas.
Richard SchweickertDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
The University of Texas at Dallas · USPurdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

Language-Motor Relations in Children's Speech ProductionR01DC004826 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI GOFFMAN, LISA · 2001 to 2014
$3.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Network science has been a valuable tool in language research for investigating relationships between complex linguistic elements but has not yet been applied to sound sequencing in production. In the present work, we used standard error-based accuracy and articulatory kinematic approaches as well as novel measures from network science to evaluate variability and sequencing errors in speech production in children with developmental language disorder (DLD; aka specific language impairment). Method: Twelve preschoolers with DLD and 12 age-matched controls participated in a 3-day novel word learning study. Transcription and articulatory movement data were collected to measure accuracy and variability of productions, and networks of speech productions were generated to analyze syllable co-occurrence patterns. Results: Results indicated that children with DLD were less accurate than children with typical language at the segmental level. Crucially, these findings did not align with performance at the articulatory level, where there were no differences in movement variability between children with DLD and those with typical language. Network analyses revealed characteristics that were not captured by standard measures of phonetic accuracy, including a larger inventory of syllable forms, more connections between the forms, and less consistent production patterns. Conclusions: Network science provides significant insights into phonological learning trajectories in children with DLD and their typically developing peers. Importantly, errors in word production by children with DLD do not surface as a result of weakness in articulatory control. Instead, results suggest that speech errors in DLD may relate to deficits in sound sequencing.

Indexed as

Child LanguageLearningPhoneticsCase-Control StudiesChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLanguage Development DisordersMalePsycholinguisticsSpeechSpeech Production Measurement

Identifiers

PMID30167667
PMCPMC6195047
OpenAlexW2889479168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.