Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30167649›Full record

ReviewJAMA neurology2018

Advances in Understanding the Pathophysiology of Lacunar Stroke: A Review.

Robert W Regenhardt, Alvin S Das, Eng H Lo, Louis R Caplan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAMA neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 142 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 225 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Hypertension, seizures, and epilepsy: a review on pathophysiology and management.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robert W RegenhardtDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Alvin S DasDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Eng H LoDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Louis R CaplanDepartment of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Targeting ROCK for Neurogliovascular Plasticity & Remodeling After StrokeP01NS055104 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LO, ENG H. · 2007 to 2018
$13.3M
Neuroscience Resident Research ProgramR25NS065743 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CASH, SYDNEY S, WILLIAMS, ZIV · 2009 to 2023
$11.8M
Role of Tau Conformations in Vascular Contribution to Cognitive Impairment and DementiaR01AG055559 · NIA · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI LO, ENG H., SHEHADAH, AMJAD · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
Thrombolysis Profiles in tPA ResponseR01NS093415 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LO, ENG H., NING, MINGMING · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
Inflammatory Mechanisms of Brain - Lymphatic Signaling in StrokeR01NS099620 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HAYAKAWA, KAZUHIDE, LO, ENG H. · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055559NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS055104NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS093415NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099620NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS065743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Stroke is the second leading cause of death in the world, and nearly one-third of ischemic strokes are lacunar strokes (LSs) or small subcortical infarcts. Although smaller in size, they create large problems, leaving many patients with intellectual and physical disabilities. Because there are limitations in understanding the underlying pathophysiology of LS, the development of novel therapies has been slow. Observations: When the term lacune was described in the 1800s, its underlying pathophysiological basis was obscure. In the 1960s, C. Miller Fisher, MD, performed autopsy studies that showed that vessels supplying lacunes displayed segmental arteriolar disorganization, characterized by vessel enlargement, hemorrhage, and fibrinoid deposition. For these pathologic changes, he coined the term lipohyalinosis. Since that time, few attempts have been made to reconcile this pathologic description with modern mechanisms of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD). During the past 6 years, progress has been made in understanding the clinical mechanisms, imaging characteristics, and genetic basis of LS. Conclusions and Relevance: Questions persist regarding the order of events related to the initiation and progression of CSVD, how LS is related to other sequelae of CSVD, and whether LS is part of a systemic disease process. The relative roles of aging, oxidative stress, mechanical stress, genetic predisposition, and other vascular risk factors should be further studied, especially in the era of widespread antihypertensive use. Although understanding of endothelial dysfunction has increased, future work on the role of media and adventitial dysfunction should be explored. Recent advances in mapping the brain vasculome may generate new hypotheses. The investigation of new therapeutic targets, aimed at reversing CSVD processes and promoting neural repair after LS, depends upon further understanding these basic mechanisms.

Indexed as

Stroke, LacunarHumans

Identifiers

PMID30167649
PMCPMC7426021
OpenAlexW2889507322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.