Trial reportJAMA cardiology2018
One-Year Safety and Clinical Outcomes of a Transcatheter Interatrial Shunt Device for the Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in the Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure (REDUCE LAP-HF I) Trial: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 81 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
REDUCE LAP-HF RANDOMIZED TRIAL I: A Study to Evaluate the Corvia Medical, Inc. IASD® System II to REDUCE Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure
Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Atrial Shunt Implantation Systems for the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Left Heart Failure Prospective, Multicenter, Single-group Target Value Clinical Trials
Who cites it
81 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 153 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phenotype characterization of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in medical device and surgical trials.ESC heart failure · 2025Pooled it
- Improvement of Hemodynamics and Quality of Life Before and After Interatrial Shunt Devices Implantation for Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Left atrium decompression devices across the spectrum of ejection fraction in heart failure: an updated systematic review and meta-regression analysis.Heart failure reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Haemodynamic changes of interatrial shunting devices for heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2022Pooled it
- First in-human modified atrial septostomy combining radiofrequency ablation and balloon dilation.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2022Trial
- Atrial septostomy as a therapeutic option in stiff left atrial syndrome.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2026Article
- Multi-Organ Physiologic Deficits During Exercise Identify Clinical and Molecular Predisposition to Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Circulation · 2026Article
- Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Challenges and Current Approaches.Research in heart yield and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of interatrial shunt treatment for heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Atrial Shunting for Heart Failure.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2025Review
- Left atrial shunting devices: why, what, how, and… when?Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Prognostic significance of right ventricular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data.Echo research and practice · 2025Article
- In vivo fluid dynamics of the Ventura interatrial shunt device in patients with heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Evaluating the role of interatrial shunt devices in heart failure management: insights from the RELIEVE-HF trial.Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
- Left Atrial Hemodynamics and Clinical Utility in Heart Failure.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction-A Phenotype Waiting to Be Explored.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Advances in device-based treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: evidence from clinical trials.ESC heart failure · 2024Review
- Device therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a new era.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Interatrial shunt devices for heart failure.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2023Article
- Percutaneous Strategies in Structural Heart Diseases: Focus on Chronic Heart Failure.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2023Article
21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
26 authors at 16 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: In patients with heart failure (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) equal to or greater than 40%, a transcatheter interatrial shunt device (IASD; Corvia Medical) reduces exercise pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and is safe compared with sham control treatment at 1 month of follow-up. The longer-term safety and patency of the IASD has not yet been demonstrated in the setting of a randomized clinical trial (RCT). Objective: To evaluate the 1-year safety and clinical outcomes of the IASD compared with a sham control treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 2, double-blind, 1-to-1 sham-controlled multicenter RCT of IASD implantation vs a sham procedure (femoral venous access and imaging of the interatrial septum without IASD) was conducted in 22 centers in the United States, Europe, and Australia on patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or ambulatory class IV HF, LVEF equal to or greater than 40%, exercise PCWP equal to or greater than 25 mm Hg, and PCWP-right atrial pressure gradient equal to or greater than 5 mm Hg. Main Outcomes and Measures: Safety was assessed by major adverse cardiac, cerebrovascular, or renal events (MACCRE). Exploratory outcomes evaluated at 1 year were hospitalizations for HF, NYHA class, quality of life, a 6-minute walk test, and device patency. Results: After 1 year, shunts were patent in all IASD-treated patients; MACCRE did not differ significantly in the IASD arm (2 of 21 [9.5%]) vs the control arm (5 of 22 [22.7%]; P = .41), and no strokes occurred. The yearly rate of hospitalizations for HF was 0.22 in the IASD arm and 0.63 in the control arm (P = .06). Median improvement in NYHA class was 1 class in the IASD arm (IQR, -1 to 0) vs 0 in the control arm (IQR, -1 to 0; P = .08). Quality of life and 6-minute walk test distance were similar in both groups. At 6 months, there was an increase in right ventricular size in the IASD arm (mean [SD], 7.9 [8.0] mL/m2) vs the control arm (-1.8 [9.6] mL/m2; P = .002), consistent with left-to-right shunting through the device; no further increase occurred in the IASD arm at 12 months. Conclusions and Relevance: The REDUCE LAP-HF I phase 2, sham-controlled RCT confirms the longer-term patency of the IASD. Through 1 year of follow-up, IASD treatment appears safe, with no significant differences in MACCRE in patients receiving IASD compared with those who received sham control treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02600234.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.