Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30167567›Full record

ArticleJACC. Basic to translational science2017

Technology Transfer: From the Research Bench to Commercialization: Part 2: The Commercialization Process.

Gail A Van Norman, Roï Eisenkot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Basic to translational science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Driving emerging technology to clinical impact.Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gail A Van NormanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Roï EisenkotCoMotion, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technology transfer (TT) encompasses a variety of activities that move academic discoveries into the public sector. Part 1 of this 2-part series explored steps in acquisition of intellectual property (IP) rights (e.g., patents and copyrights). Part 2 focuses on processes of commercialization, including the technology transfer office, project development toward commercialization, and licensing either through the establishment of startup companies (venture capital-backed or otherwise) or directly to industry. In private industry, TT often occurs through the sale of IP, products, or services, but in universities, the majority of TT occurs through the licensing of IP.

Indexed as

COI, conflict of interestcommercializationCRADA, cooperative research and development agreementIP, intellectual propertylicensingMTA, materials transfer agreementNIH, National Institutes of HealthSBIR, small business innovation research (grant)SRA, sponsored research agreementSTTR, small business technology transfer research (grant)technology transferTTO, technology transfer officeTT, technology transferVC, venture capitalventure capital

Identifiers

PMID30167567
PMCPMC6113541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.