ArticleBMJ open quality2018
TIME to think about delirium: improving detection and management on the acute medical unit.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- High prevalence of unrecognized postoperative delirium in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study from a resource-limited country.Patient safety in surgery · 2025Article
- Development of a checklist for systematic screening of precipitating factors in older patients admitted to hospital with delirium.European geriatric medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Quality of Delirium Website Content for Patient and Family Education: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- A survey of non-consultant hospital doctors' perspectives, knowledge, and practices toward delirium in a large Irish hospital.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
- An occupational therapy delirium pathway reduces hospital re-presentations in older adults with delirium: A before and after observational study.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2024Article
- Characterizing medical patients with delirium: A cohort study comparing ICD-10 codes and a validated chart review method.PloS one · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of a Multi-component Delirium Prevention Program Implemented on General Medicine Hospital Units: an Interrupted Time Series Analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- POSTOPED: improving surveillance of postoperative delirium in a Scottish tertiary hospital.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Diagnostic test accuracy of assessment tools for detecting delirium in patients with acute stroke: commentary of a systematic review.British journal of neuroscience nursing · 2022Article
- Impact of a dementia-friendly program on detection and management of patients with cognitive impairment and delirium in acute-care hospital units: a controlled clinical trial design.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- Delirium can be safely managed in the community through implementation of a community toolkit: a proof-of-concept pilot study.Future healthcare journal · 2022Article
- Improving delirium screening and recognition in UK hospitals: results of a multi-centre quality improvement project.Age and ageing · 2022Article
- Electronic Paper Displays in Hospital Operations: Proposal for Deployment and Implementation.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Implementation of a multicomponent intervention sign to reduce delirium in orthopaedic inpatients (MIND-ORIENT): a quality improvement project.BMJ open quality · 2021Article
- Delirium.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2020Review
- Quality improvement and delirium.European geriatric medicine · 2020Review
- Delirium is prevalent in older hospital inpatients and associated with adverse outcomes: results of a prospective multi-centre study on World Delirium Awareness Day.BMC medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Delirium affects 18%-35% patients in the acute hospital setting, yet is often neither detected nor managed appropriately. It is associated with increased risk of falls, longer hospital stay and increased morbidity and mortality rates. It is a frightening and unpleasant experience for both patients and their families. We used quality improvement tools and a multicomponent intervention to promote detection and improve management of delirium on the acute medical unit (AMU). We reviewed whether a delirium screening tool (4AT) had been completed for all patients aged over 65 years admitted to the AMU over 1 week. If delirium was detected, we assessed whether investigation and management was adequate as per national guidance. After baseline data collection, we delivered focused sessions of delirium education for doctors and nursing staff, including training on use of the 4AT tool and the TIME (Triggers, Investigate, Manage, Engage) management bundle. We introduced TIME checklists, an online delirium order set and created a bedside orientation tool. We collected data following the interventions and identified areas for further improvement. Following our first PDSA (Plan, Do, Study, Act) cycle, use of the 4AT screening tool improved from 40% to 61%. Adequate assessment for the causes of and exacerbating factors for delirium increased from 73% to 94% of cases. Use of personal orientation tools improved from 0% to 38%. In summary, a targeted staff education programme and practical aids for the ward have improved the screening and management of delirium on the AMU. This may be improved further through more frequent training sessions to account for regular change-over of junior doctors and through implementing a nursing champion for delirium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.