Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30167344›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2018

Validation of a Standardized Patient Checklist for Patient-Centered Communication: The G-PACER.

Nicholas W Talisman, Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza, Pamela A Saunders, Bonnie L Green

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicholas W TalismanDepartment of Psychiatry, Georgetown University School of Medicine.
Alejandra Hurtado-de-MendozaDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University School of Medicine.
Pamela A SaundersDepartments of Neurology and Psychiatry, Georgetown University School of Medicine.
Bonnie L GreenDepartment of Psychiatry, Georgetown University School of Medicine.
Georgetown University · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001432 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI UMANS, JASON G · 2015 to 2024
$7.5M
Improving Communication Between Primary Care Providers and Their Trauma PatientsR34MH079970 · NIMH · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI GREEN, BONNIE L · 2008 to 2010
$910k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001432NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH079970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study sought to validate the Georgetown PAtient-CEnteredness Rating Scale (G-PACER) standardized patient (SP) checklist as a measure of patient-centered communication in patient-provider interactions. Patient centeredness is associated with improved doctor-patient communication and better health outcomes. Simulated medical encounters using SPs are an important way to teach and evaluate provider communication skills, yet validated SP scales that focus on patient-centered communication are limited. Two versions of an SP checklist of provider interaction behaviors, the G-PACER, were developed as part of a training designed to improve relationships between providers and patients who have experienced trauma. Concurrent validity of the G-PACER was assessed with Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) summary scores, particularly the patient-centeredness summary score. Item-total correlations were conducted to determine which items should be retained for future versions of the scale. Scores on the G-PACER were significantly correlated with the RIAS Patient-Centeredness score. Correlation analysis also revealed significant associations between G-PACER Total Score and RIAS Global Affect Ratings. The twelve-item version of the G-PACER performed at a commensurate level with the longer version; thus, it's use is recommended in future research. This study represents an important step in the development of reliable, valid, and efficient tools to add to those available for evaluating patient-provider interactions from the SP perspective.

Identifiers

PMID30167344
PMCPMC6110535
OpenAlexW2794286174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.