Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30167343›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2018

Virtual Autopsy as a Screening Test Before Traditional Autopsy: The Verona Experience on 25 Cases.

Vito Cirielli, Luca Cima, Federica Bortolotti, Murali Narayanasamy, Maria Pia Scarpelli, Olivia Danzi, Matteo Brunelli, Albino Eccher, Francesca Vanzo, Maria Chiara Ambrosetti and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Vito CirielliDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Forensic Pathology Unit, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Italy.
Luca CimaDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Anatomic Pathology Unit, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Italy.
Federica BortolottiDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Forensic Pathology Unit, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Italy.
Murali NarayanasamyDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.
Maria Pia ScarpelliDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Forensic Pathology Unit, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Italy.
Olivia DanziDepartment of Neurological, Biomedical and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Italy.
Matteo BrunelliDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Anatomic Pathology Unit, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Italy.
Albino EccherDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Anatomic Pathology Unit, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Italy.
Francesca VanzoCenter Research and Innovation for Digital Health, Veneto, Italy.
Maria Chiara AmbrosettiDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Radiology Unit, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Italy.
Ghassan El-DalatiDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Radiology Unit, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Italy.
Peter VanezisDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Cameron Forensic Medical Sciences, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, United Kingdom.
Domenico De LeoDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Forensic Pathology Unit, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Italy.
Franco TagliaroDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Forensic Pathology Unit, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Italy.
Queen Elizabeth Hospital · MYSechenov University · RUUniversity of Verona · ITWilliam Harvey Research Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterest has grown into the use of multidetector computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct or alternative to the invasive autopsy. We sought to investigate these possibilities in postmortem CT scan using an innovative virtual autopsy approach.

methodsTwenty-five postmortem cases were scanned with the Philips Brilliance CT-64 and then underwent traditional autopsy. The images were interpreted by two blinded forensic pathologists assisted by a radiologist with the INFOPSY

resultsThe causes of death at traditional autopsies were hemorrhage due to traumatic injuries (

conclusionsOur experience supports the use of virtual autopsy in postmortem investigations as an alternative diagnostic practice and does suggest a potential role as a screening test among traumatic deaths.

Indexed as

Computed tomographycomputed tomography scanforensic sciencespostmortem investigationtraumatic deathsvirtual autopsies

Identifiers

PMID30167343
PMCPMC6106125
OpenAlexW2883001568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.