Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30167331›Full record

ReviewESMO open2018

CDK4/6 inhibitors in the treatment of patients with breast cancer: summary of a multidisciplinary round-table discussion.

Matthias Preusser, Leticia De Mattos-Arruda, Marc Thill, Carmen Criscitiello, Rupert Bartsch, Thomas Ruhstaller, Evandro de Azambuja, Christoph C Zielinski

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESMO open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matthias PreusserClinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University Vienna - General Hospital, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: matthias.preusser@meduniwien.ac.at.
Leticia De Mattos-ArrudaVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Marc ThillDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Carmen CriscitielloDivision of Experimental Therapeutics, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy.
Rupert BartschClinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Thomas RuhstallerBreast Center St. Gallen, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Evandro de AzambujaMedicine Department, Institut Jules Bordet and L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium.
Christoph C ZielinskiComprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University Vienna - General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article is the result of a round-table discussion organised by ESMO Open in Vienna in December 2017. Its purpose is to discuss the background and advances in the evidence regarding cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib) in the treatment of metastatic and early-stage breast cancer and to explore what the key open research questions are and next steps should be.

Indexed as

breast cancerCDK4/6 inhibitorsendocrine resistanceendocrine therapyHR-positive breast cancermetastatic breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID30167331
PMCPMC6109817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.