Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30167263›Full record

ArticleLight, science & applications2017

Non-interferometric photoacoustic remote sensing microscopy.

Parsin Hajireza, Wei Shi, Kevan Bell, Robert J Paproski, Roger J Zemp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Light, science & applications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Parsin HajirezaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2V4 Canada.
Wei ShiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2V4 Canada.
Kevan BellDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2V4 Canada.
Robert J PaproskiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2V4 Canada.
Roger J ZempDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2V4 Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elasto-optical refractive index modulation due to photoacoustic initial pressure transients produced significant reflection of a probe beam when the absorbing interface had an appreciable refractive index difference. This effect was harnessed in a new form of non-contact optical resolution photoacoustic microscopy called photoacoustic remote sensing microscopy. A non-interferometric system architecture with a low-coherence probe beam precludes detection of surface oscillations and other phase-modulation phenomenon. The probe beam was confocal with a scanned excitation beam to ensure detection of initial pressure-induced intensity reflections at the subsurface origin where pressures are largest. Phantom studies confirmed signal dependence on optical absorption, index contrast and excitation fluence.

Indexed as

all opticalmedical imagingoptical resolutionphotoacousticremote sensing

Identifiers

PMID30167263
PMCPMC6062239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.