ArticleJournal of integrated care (Brighton, England)2018
Transforming primary care: scoping review of research and practice.
Article in Journal of integrated care (Brighton, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing healthy ageing in Greece: the WHO ICOPE protocol within the JA PreventNCD framework.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Strategies for optimising health system managers' engagement in quality improvement projects: lessons learnt from the COMPAS+ project.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- The Community Primary Care Champions Fellowship: a mixed methods evaluation of an interprofessional fellowship for physician assistants and physicians.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Ten years later: A portrait of the implementation of the advanced access model in Quebec.Healthcare management forum · 2023Article
- Article
- Impact of externally facilitated continuous quality improvement cohorts on Advanced Access to support primary healthcare teams: protocol for a quasi-randomized cluster trial.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Barriers and enablers of integrated care in the UK: a rapid evidence review of review articles and grey literature 2018-2022.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Using a theoretical framework to inform implementation of the patient-centred medical home (PCMH) model in primary care: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2022Article
- Interprofessional collaboration to support patients with social problems in general practice-a qualitative focus group study.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Transforming primary care in Scotland: a critical policy analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022Article
- Quality and team care response to the pandemic stresses in high performing primary care practices: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2022Article
- Characterizing the reach of comprehensive medication management in a population health primary care model.Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP · 2021Article
- Interprofessional advanced access - a quality improvement protocol for expanding access to primary care services.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Article
- Integrated Care Programs for People with Multimorbidity in European Countries: eHealth Adoption in Health Systems.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- What happened and why? A programme theory-based qualitative evaluation of a healthcare-academia partnership reform in primary care.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Nursing Care Coordination in Primary Healthcare for Patients with Complex Needs: A Comparative Case Study.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this paper is to reflect on research evidence and practice experience of transforming primary care to a more integrated and holistic model. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: It is based on a scoping review which has been guided by primary care stakeholders and synthesises research evidence and practice experience from ten international case studies.
findingsAdopting an inter-professional, community-orientated and population-based primary care model requires a fundamental transformation of thinking about professional roles, relationships and responsibilities. Team-based approaches can replicate existing power dynamics unless medical clinicians are willing to embrace less authoritarian leadership styles. Engagement of patients and communities is often limited due to a lack of capacity and belief that will make an impact. Internal (relationships, cultures, experience of improvement) and external (incentives, policy intentions, community pressure) contexts can encourage or derail transformation efforts. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Transformation requires a co-ordinated programme that incorporates the following elements - external facilitation of change; developing clinical and non-clinical leaders; learning through training and reflection; engaging community and professional stakeholders; transitional funding; and formative and summative evaluation. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This paper combines research evidence and international practice experience to guide future programmes to transform primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.