Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30166936›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in colloid & interface science2018

From electron crystallography of 2D crystals to MicroED of 3D crystals.

Michael W Martynowycz, Tamir Gonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in colloid & interface science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Microcrystal Electron Diffraction for Molecular Design of Functional Non-Fullerene Acceptor Structures.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Machining protein microcrystals for structure determination by electron diffraction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  12. Biophysics reports · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael W MartynowyczJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia 20147, USA.
Tamir GonenJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia 20147, USA.

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electron crystallography is widespread in material science applications, but for biological samples its use has been restricted to a handful of examples where two-dimensional (2D) crystals or helical samples were studied either by electron diffraction and/or imaging. Electron crystallography in cryoEM, was developed in the mid-1970s and used to solve the structure of several membrane proteins and some soluble proteins. In 2013, a new method for cryoEM was unveiled and named Micro-crystal Electron Diffraction, or MicroED, which is essentially three-dimensional (3D) electron crystallography of microscopic crystals. This method uses truly 3D crystals, that are about a billion times smaller than those typically used for X-ray crystallography, for electron diffraction studies. There are several important differences and some similarities between electron crystallography of 2D crystals and MicroED. In this review, we describe the development of these techniques, their similarities and differences, and offer our opinion of future directions in both fields.

Indexed as

cryoEM (electorn cryo-microscopy)electron crystallographyElectron diffractionMicroED

Identifiers

PMID30166936
PMCPMC6112780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.