ArticleTransactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association2018
THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD AND DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL STUDENTS' MENTAL PATIENT MODELS.
Article in Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical practitioners routinely use dual process clinical reasoning: pattern recognition, termed system 1 thinking, and system 2 thinking or analytic reasoning. System 1 thinking, a hallmark of expertise developed through experience with multiple similar patients and deliberate practice, is rapid and automatic. For decades, the structured written medical write-up and progress notes served an educational as well as a patient care role. The introduction of electronic health records (EHRs) potentially hinders the development of the cognitive models upon which system 1 thinking is predicated. Using a vignette-based extended matching chief complaint examination, we investigated the effects of introducing an inpatient EHR on three classes of third-year medical students before and after the EHR implementation. While some subsection scores were significantly different, there was no overall change in performance. Based on this assessment, the development of cognitive models of patient presentations is not impeded by the introduction of an EHR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30166709PMC6116586W2997637743What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.