Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30166275›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2018

Supportive Care in Radiotherapy Based on a Mobile App: Prospective Multicenter Survey.

Rami A El Shafie, Dorothea Weber, Nina Bougatf, Tanja Sprave, Dieter Oetzel, Peter E Huber, Jürgen Debus, Nils H Nicolay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mobile applications in radiation oncology-current choices and future potentials.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Prospective trial on telemonitoring of geriatric cancer patients using handheld devices.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Oncologic treatment support via a dedicated mobile app: a prospective feasibility evaluation (OPTIMISE-1).Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rami A El ShafieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1355-7882
Dorothea WeberInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4850-9116
Nina BougatfDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0718-7360
Tanja SpraveDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1292-1352
Dieter OetzelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5193-8942
Peter E HuberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3872-2343
Jürgen DebusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6411-4811
Nils H NicolayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2550-1410
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsumer electronics and Web-enabled mobile devices are playing an increasing role in patient care, and their use in the oncologic sector opens up promising possibilities in the fields of supportive cancer care and systematic patient follow-up.

objectiveThe objective of our study was to assess the acceptance and possible benefits of a mobile app-based concept for supportive care of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

methodsIn total, 975 patients presenting for radiotherapy due to breast or prostate cancer were screened; of them, 200 owned a smartphone and consented to participate in the survey. Patients were requested to complete a questionnaire at 2 time points: prior to the initiation (T0) and after the completion (T1) of radiotherapy. The questionnaire included questions about the habits of smartphone usage, technical knowledge and abilities of the participants, readiness to use a mobile app within the context of radiotherapy, possible features of the mobile app, and general attitude toward the different aspects of oncologic treatments. For quantitative analysis, sum scores were calculated for all areas of interest, and results were correlated with patient characteristics. Additionally, answers were quantitatively compared between time points T0 and T1.

resultsMedian patient age was 57 (range 27-78) years. Of the 200 participants, 131 (66.2%) reported having the ability to use their smartphones with minimal to no help and 75.8% (150/200) had not used their smartphones in a medical context before. However, 73.3% (146/200) and 83.4% (166/200) of patients showed a strong interest in using a mobile app for supportive care during radiotherapy and as part of the clinical follow-up, respectively. Patients most commonly requested functionalities regarding appointment scheduling in the clinic (176/200, 88.0%) and the collection of patient-reported outcome data regarding their illness, therapy, and general well-being (130/200, 65.0%). Age was identified as the most influential factor regarding patient attitude, with patients aged <55 years being significantly more inclined toward and versed in smartphone use (P<.001). The acceptance of mobile apps was significantly higher in patients exhibiting a Karnofsky performance index <80% (P=.01). Support in the context of therapy-related side effects was judged most important by patients with poor clinical performance (P=.006). The overall acceptance of mobile apps in the context of radiotherapy surveillance was high at a median item sum score of 71.4/100 and was not significantly influenced by tumor stage, age, gender, treatment setting, or previous radiotherapies.

conclusionsThe acceptance of mobile apps for the surveillance and follow-up of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy is high; this high acceptance level will serve as a basis for future clinical trials investigating the clinical benefits of mobile app-based treatment support. Introduction of mobile apps into the clinical routine should be considered as an opportunity to improve and intensify supportive treatment for cancer patients.

Indexed as

acceptancemHealthmobile appmobile phonepatient-reported outcomequality of liferadiotherapysmartphonesurveillance

Identifiers

PMID30166275
PMCPMC6137282
OpenAlexW2807845192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.