Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30166272›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2018

Automated retinopathy of prematurity screening using deep neural networks.

Jianyong Wang, Rong Ju, Yuanyuan Chen, Lei Zhang, Junjie Hu, Yu Wu, Wentao Dong, Jie Zhong, Zhang Yi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jianyong WangMachine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China.
Rong JuDepartment of Neonatology, Chengdu Women & Children's Central Hospital, Chengdu, PR China.
Yuanyuan ChenMachine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China.
Lei ZhangMachine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China.
Junjie HuMachine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China.
Yu WuMachine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China.
Wentao DongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, PR China.
Jie ZhongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, PR China. Electronic address: zjllxx1968@163.com.
Zhang YiMachine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China. Electronic address: zhangyi@scu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is the leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide. Automated ROP detection system is urgent and it appears to be a safe, reliable, and cost-effective complement to human experts.

methodsAn automated ROP detection system called DeepROP was developed by using Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). ROP detection was divided into ROP identification and grading tasks. Two specific DNN models, i.e., Id-Net and Gr-Net, were designed for identification and grading tasks, respectively. To develop the DNNs, large-scale datasets of retinal fundus images were constructed by labeling the images of ROP screenings by clinical ophthalmologists.

findingsOn the test dataset, the Id-Net achieved a sensitivity of 96.62%(95%CI, 92.29%-98.89%) and a specificity of 99.32% (95%CI, 96.29%-9.98%) for ROP identification while the Gr-Net attained sensitivity and specificity values of 88.46% (95%CI, 96.29%-99.98%) and 92.31% (95%CI, 81.46%-97.86%), respectively, on the ROP grading task. On another 552 cases, the developed DNNs outperformed some human experts. In a clinical setting, the sensitivity and specificity values of DeepROP for ROP identification were 84.91% (95%CI, 76.65%-91.12%) and 96.90% (95%CI, 95.49%-97.96%), respectively, whereas the corresponding measures for ROP grading were 93.33%(95%CI, 68.05%-99.83%) and 73.63%(95%CI, 68.05%-99.83%), respectively.

interpretationWe constructed large-scale ROP datasets with adequate clinical labels and proposed novel DNN models. The DNN models can directly learn ROP features from big data. The developed DeepROP is potential to be an efficient and effective system for automated ROP screening. FUND: National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61432012 and U1435213.

Indexed as

AutomationDeep LearningMass ScreeningNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsBirth WeightDatabases as TopicGestational AgeHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInfantInternetRetinopathy of PrematurityROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID30166272
PMCPMC6156692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.