ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2018
DNA-based Determination of Ancestry in Cynomolgus Macaques (
Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel SNP assay reveals increased genetic variability and abundance following translocations to a remnant Allegheny woodrat population.BMC ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Population Structure of Macaca fascicularis aurea, and their Genetic Relationships with M. f. fascicularis and M. mulatta Determined by 868 RADseq-Derived Autosomal SNPs-A consideration for biomedical research.Journal of medical primatology · 2022Article
- Reference Intervals for Total T4 and Free T4 in Cynomolgus Macaques (Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Interest in the genetic composition of cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) has increased due to the rising demand for NHP models in human biomedical research. Significant genetic differences among regional populations of cynomolgus macaques can confound interpretations of research results because they do not solely reflect differences in experimental treatment effects. Therefore, the common origin of cynomolgus macaques used as research subjects should be verified by using region-specific genetic markers to minimize the influence of underlying genetic variation among animals selected as research subjects on phenotypes under study. We compared the effectiveness of 18 short tandem repeat (STR) markers with that of 83 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers to differentiate the ancestry of cynomolgus macaques from 6 different populations (Cambodia, Sumatra, Mauritius, Singapore, and the islands of Luzon and Zamboanga in the Philippines). Genetic diversity indices such as allele numbers and expected heterozygosity based on SNP were lower and exhibited lower standard errors than those provided by STR, probably because, unlike STR, most SNP are biallelic and consequently exhibit maximal expected heterozygosity values of 0.50. However, the standard error of estimates of observed heterozygosity based on SNP was higher than that for STR, perhaps reflecting sampling errors. Only 27 SNP were required to match the resolving power of 17 STR to detect population structure, that is, 1.6 SNP:1 STR. Whereas STR only differentiated the Mauritian population from all other populations, SNP detected 4 genetically distinct groups (Cambodia, Singapore-Sumatra, Mauritius, and Zamboanga). SNP are poised to become as valuable as STR for understanding and detecting genetic structure among cynomolgus macaques. Although STR will remain an important tool for cynomolgus macaque population studies, SNP have the potential to become the mainstream marker type.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.