ArticleEuropean heart journal2018
Real-world clinical utility and impact on clinical decision-making of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: lessons from the ADVANCE Registry.
Article in European heart journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03901326 (The Effect of On-site CT-derived Fractional Flow Reserve on the Management Making for the Patients With Stable Chest Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 142 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of On-site CT-derived Fractional Flow Reserve on the Management Making for the Patients With Stable Chest Pain (TARGET Trial)
Who cites it
142 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiographic derived fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2022Pooled it
- SCCT 2021 Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.Journal of cardiovascular computed tomographyGuideline
- Sex Differences in Computed Tomography Coronary Stenosis Severity Versus Flow Impairment and Impact on Revascularization, Clinical Events and Health Care Costs: A FORECAST Substudy.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- Combined prognostic value of AI-derived CT-FFR and high-risk plaque characteristics in patients with newly diagnosed chronic coronary syndrome: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Trial
- Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Compared With Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging as a Guide to Optimal Medical Therapy in Patients Presenting With Stable Angina: The RESCUE Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Trial
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Anatomic vs Functional Index Testing in Patients With Low-Risk Stable Chest Pain.JAMA network open · 2020Trial
- Advanced quantitative CT for coronary artery disease: integrating stenosis quantification, plaque quantification, and fractional flow reserve-CT.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Clinical Management Across CAD-RADS Categories in Patients with Intermediate CT-FFR.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- South Asian Cardiovascular Risk: Role of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring and Computed Tomography Angiography.JACC. Asia · 2026Review
- Clinical use of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: expert consensus by an International Working Group.European radiology · 2026Article
- Sex differences in CT-FFR of myocardial bridging with or without atherosclerosis: an AI-based quantitative study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Bibliometric analysis of research hotspots in coronary artery CT fractional flow reserve for diagnosing myocardial ischemia in coronary artery disease.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment: Technical Foundations, Clinical Insights, and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Precision cardiovascular medicine with big data and AI.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Aortic Valve Calcification Scores versus CT-FFR: Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Cardiology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Plaque Characterization: Clinical Implications, Evidence Gaps, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Emerging quantitative CCTA imaging biomarkers for cardiovascular risk stratification: a narrative review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Impact of Diabetes on Management and Outcomes in Patients with Borderline FFRJournal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- From Echo to Coronary Angiography: Optimizing Ischemia Evaluation Through Multimodal Imaging.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Non-invasive assessment of stable chest pain patients is a critical determinant of resource utilization and clinical outcomes. Increasingly coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with selective CCTA-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) is being used. The ADVANCE Registry, is a large prospective examination of using a CCTA and FFRCT diagnostic pathway in real-world settings, with the aim of determining the impact of this pathway on decision-making, downstream invasive coronary angiography (ICA), revascularization, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Methods and results: A total of 5083 patients with symptoms concerning for coronary artery disease (CAD) and atherosclerosis on CCTA were enrolled at 38 international sites from 15 July 2015 to 20 October 2017. Demographics, symptom status, CCTA and FFRCT findings, treatment plans, and 90 days outcomes were recorded. The primary endpoint of reclassification between core lab CCTA alone and CCTA plus FFRCT-based management plans occurred in 66.9% [confidence interval (CI): 64.8-67.6] of patients. Non-obstructive coronary disease was significantly lower in ICA patients with FFRCT ≤0.80 (14.4%) compared to patients with FFRCT >0.80 (43.8%, odds ratio 0.19, CI: 0.15-0.25, P < 0.001). In total, 72.3% of subjects undergoing ICA with FFRCT ≤0.80 were revascularized. No death/myocardial infarction (MI) occurred within 90 days in patients with FFRCT >0.80 (n = 1529), whereas 19 (0.6%) MACE [hazard ratio (HR) 19.75, CI: 1.19-326, P = 0.0008] and 14 (0.3%) death/MI (HR 14.68, CI 0.88-246, P = 0.039) occurred in subjects with an FFRCT ≤0.80. Conclusions: In a large international multicentre population, FFRCT modified treatment recommendation in two-thirds of subjects as compared to CCTA alone, was associated with less negative ICA, predicted revascularization, and identified subjects at low risk of adverse events through 90 days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.