Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30165613›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal2018

Real-world clinical utility and impact on clinical decision-making of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: lessons from the ADVANCE Registry.

Timothy A Fairbairn, Koen Nieman, Takashi Akasaka, Bjarne L Nørgaard, Daniel S Berman, Gilbert Raff, Lynne M Hurwitz-Koweek, Gianluca Pontone, Tomohiro Kawasaki, Niels Peter Sand and 13 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03901326 (The Effect of On-site CT-derived Fractional Flow Reserve on the Management Making for the Patients With Stable Chest Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 142 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03901326 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of On-site CT-derived Fractional Flow Reserve on the Management Making for the Patients With Stable Chest Pain (TARGET Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese PLA General HospitalRan2019 to 2022Enrolled1,216ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsCT-FFR assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Clinical Management Across CAD-RADS Categories in Patients with Intermediate CT-FFR.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Impact of Diabetes on Management and Outcomes in Patients with Borderline FFRJournal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Timothy A FairbairnLiverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Thomas Drive, Liverpool, UK.
Koen NiemanStanford and Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Takashi AkasakaWakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera Wakayama, Wakayama, Japan.
Bjarne L NørgaardAarhus University Hospital, Department Cardiology B, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Daniel S BermanCedars Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Gilbert RaffWilliam Beaumont Hospital, 3601 West 13 Mile Road, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Lynne M Hurwitz-KoweekDuke University School of Medicine, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, USA.
Gianluca PontoneCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, University of Milan, Via Carlo Parea 4, Milan, Italy.
Tomohiro KawasakiShin Koga Hospital, 120 Tenjin-machi, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
Niels Peter SandUniversity of Southern Denmark, Sdr Boulevard 29, Odense, Denmark.
Jesper M JensenAarhus University Hospital, Department Cardiology B, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Tetsuya AmanoAichi Medical University, 1-1 Yazakokarimata Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Michael PoonNorthwell Health, 100 E 77th Street, New York, NY, USA.
Kristian ØvrehusUniversity of Southern Denmark, Sdr Boulevard 29, Odense, Denmark.
Jeroen SonckUZ Brussels, Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, Belgium.
Mark RabbatLoyola University Medical Center, 2160 South First Avenue, Maywood, IL, USA.
Sarah MullenHeartFlow Inc., 1400 Seaport Blvd, Bldg B, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Bernard De BruyneOnze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Moorselbaan 164, Aalst, Belgium.
Campbell RogersHeartFlow Inc., 1400 Seaport Blvd, Bldg B, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Hitoshi MatsuoGifu Heart Center, 4-14-4 Yabutaminami, Gifu Gifu, Japan.
Jeroen J BaxLeiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, AZ, Netherlands.
Jonathon LeipsicDepartment of Radiology, University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Manesh R PatelDuke University School of Medicine, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Non-invasive assessment of stable chest pain patients is a critical determinant of resource utilization and clinical outcomes. Increasingly coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with selective CCTA-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) is being used. The ADVANCE Registry, is a large prospective examination of using a CCTA and FFRCT diagnostic pathway in real-world settings, with the aim of determining the impact of this pathway on decision-making, downstream invasive coronary angiography (ICA), revascularization, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Methods and results: A total of 5083 patients with symptoms concerning for coronary artery disease (CAD) and atherosclerosis on CCTA were enrolled at 38 international sites from 15 July 2015 to 20 October 2017. Demographics, symptom status, CCTA and FFRCT findings, treatment plans, and 90 days outcomes were recorded. The primary endpoint of reclassification between core lab CCTA alone and CCTA plus FFRCT-based management plans occurred in 66.9% [confidence interval (CI): 64.8-67.6] of patients. Non-obstructive coronary disease was significantly lower in ICA patients with FFRCT ≤0.80 (14.4%) compared to patients with FFRCT >0.80 (43.8%, odds ratio 0.19, CI: 0.15-0.25, P < 0.001). In total, 72.3% of subjects undergoing ICA with FFRCT ≤0.80 were revascularized. No death/myocardial infarction (MI) occurred within 90 days in patients with FFRCT >0.80 (n = 1529), whereas 19 (0.6%) MACE [hazard ratio (HR) 19.75, CI: 1.19-326, P = 0.0008] and 14 (0.3%) death/MI (HR 14.68, CI 0.88-246, P = 0.039) occurred in subjects with an FFRCT ≤0.80. Conclusions: In a large international multicentre population, FFRCT modified treatment recommendation in two-thirds of subjects as compared to CCTA alone, was associated with less negative ICA, predicted revascularization, and identified subjects at low risk of adverse events through 90 days.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseAgedFemaleFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial RevascularizationProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID30165613
PMCPMC6215963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.