Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30165589›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2018

MACSE v2: Toolkit for the Alignment of Coding Sequences Accounting for Frameshifts and Stop Codons.

Vincent Ranwez, Emmanuel J P Douzery, Cédric Cambon, Nathalie Chantret, Frédéric Delsuc

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 431 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
431citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

431 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Experimental pathogenicity ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

371 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vincent RanwezAGAP, Université de Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Emmanuel J P DouzeryInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (ISEM), UMR 5554, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Cédric CambonAGAP, Université de Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Nathalie ChantretAGAP, Université de Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Frédéric DelsucInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (ISEM), UMR 5554, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sequence alignment is a prerequisite for many evolutionary analyses. Multiple Alignment of Coding Sequences (MACSE) is a multiple sequence alignment program that explicitly accounts for the underlying codon structure of protein-coding nucleotide sequences. Its unique characteristic allows building reliable codon alignments even in the presence of frameshifts. This facilitates downstream analyses such as selection pressure estimation based on the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions. Here, we present MACSE v2, a major update with an improved version of the initial algorithm enriched with a complete toolkit to handle multiple alignments of protein-coding sequences. A graphical interface now provides user-friendly access to the different subprograms.

Indexed as

Sequence AlignmentSoftwareCodon, TerminatorFrameshift MutationCodon, Terminator

Identifiers

PMID30165589
PMCPMC6188553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.