Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30165509›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019

The Distance Precision Matrix: computing networks from non-linear relationships.

Mahsa Ghanbari, Julia Lasserre, Martin Vingron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mahsa GhanbariDepartment of Computational Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.
Julia LasserreZalando Research, Mühlenstr. 25, D-10243 Berlin, Germany.
Martin VingronDepartment of Computational Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationFull-order partial correlation, a fundamental approach for network reconstruction, e.g. in the context of gene regulation, relies on the precision matrix (the inverse of the covariance matrix) as an indicator of which variables are directly associated. The precision matrix assumes Gaussian linear data and its entries are zero for pairs of variables that are independent given all other variables. However, there is still very little theory on network reconstruction under the assumption of non-linear interactions among variables.

resultsWe propose Distance Precision Matrix, a network reconstruction method aimed at both linear and non-linear data. Like partial distance correlation, it builds on distance covariance, a measure of possibly non-linear association, and on the idea of full-order partial correlation, which allows to discard indirect associations. We provide evidence that the Distance Precision Matrix method can successfully compute networks from linear and non-linear data, and consistently so across different datasets, even if sample size is low. The method is fast enough to compute networks on hundreds of nodes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An R package DPM is available at https://github.molgen.mpg.de/ghanbari/DPM. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksNormal DistributionSample Size

Identifiers

PMID30165509
PMCPMC6420154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.