ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
Penalized co-inertia analysis with applications to -omics data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating host-microbiome multi-omics with machine learning: methods, benchmarks, and translational applications.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Review
- Integrative Analysis of Multimodal Omics Data.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2026Article
- Knowledge-guided learning methods for integrative analysis of multi-omics data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- TARO: tree-aggregated factor regression for microbiome data integration.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- A primer on correlation-based dimension reduction methods for multi-omics analysis.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Review
- Article
- Interest of phenomic prediction as an alternative to genomic prediction in grapevine.Plant methods · 2022Article
- Sparse linear discriminant analysis for multiview structured data.Biometrics · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- TSCCA: A tensor sparse CCA method for detecting microRNA-gene patterns from multiple cancers.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Vertical integration methods for gene expression data analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- Integration of Proteomics and Other Omics Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Sparse multiple co-Inertia analysis with application to integrative analysis of multi -Omics data.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Knowledge-Guided Statistical Learning Methods for Analysis of High-Dimensional -Omics Data in Precision Oncology.JCO precision oncology · 2019Review
- A Selective Review of Multi-Level Omics Data Integration Using Variable Selection.High-throughput · 2019Review
- Microbiome Multi-Omics Network Analysis: Statistical Considerations, Limitations, and Opportunities.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationCo-inertia analysis (CIA) is a multivariate statistical analysis method that can assess relationships and trends in two sets of data. Recently CIA has been used for an integrative analysis of multiple high-dimensional omics data. However, for classical CIA, all elements in the loading vectors are nonzero, presenting a challenge for the interpretation when analyzing omics data. For other multivariate statistical methods such as canonical correlation analysis (CCA), penalized least squares (PLS), various approaches have been proposed to produce sparse loading vectors via l1-penalization/constraint. We propose a novel CIA method that uses l1-penalization to induce sparsity in estimators of loading vectors. Our method simultaneously conducts model fitting and variable selection. Also, we propose another CIA method that incorporates structure/network information such as those from functional genomics, besides using sparsity penalty so that one can get biologically meaningful and interpretable results.
resultsExtensive simulations demonstrate that our proposed penalized CIA methods achieve the best or close to the best performance compared to the existing CIA method in terms of feature selection and recovery of true loading vectors. Also, we apply our methods to the integrative analysis of gene expression data and protein abundance data from the NCI-60 cancer cell lines. Our analysis of the NCI-60 cancer cell line data reveals meaningful variables for cancer diseases and biologically meaningful results that are consistent with previous studies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our algorithms are implemented as an R package which is freely available at: https://www.med.upenn.edu/long-lab/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.