Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30165424›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019

Penalized co-inertia analysis with applications to -omics data.

Eun Jeong Min, Sandra E Safo, Qi Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Integrative Analysis of Multimodal Omics Data.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2026
    Article
  3. Knowledge-guided learning methods for integrative analysis of multi-omics data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Integration of Proteomics and Other Omics Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eun Jeong MinDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sandra E SafoDivision of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Qi LongDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHELLEY L BERGER · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
Privacy-preserving methods and tools for handling missing data in distributed health data networksR01GM124111 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LONG, QI · 2017 to 2020
$2.3M
Statistical Methods for Causal Inference in Observational StudiesR21NS091630 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LONG, QI · 2015 to 2016
$424k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124111NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS091630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationCo-inertia analysis (CIA) is a multivariate statistical analysis method that can assess relationships and trends in two sets of data. Recently CIA has been used for an integrative analysis of multiple high-dimensional omics data. However, for classical CIA, all elements in the loading vectors are nonzero, presenting a challenge for the interpretation when analyzing omics data. For other multivariate statistical methods such as canonical correlation analysis (CCA), penalized least squares (PLS), various approaches have been proposed to produce sparse loading vectors via l1-penalization/constraint. We propose a novel CIA method that uses l1-penalization to induce sparsity in estimators of loading vectors. Our method simultaneously conducts model fitting and variable selection. Also, we propose another CIA method that incorporates structure/network information such as those from functional genomics, besides using sparsity penalty so that one can get biologically meaningful and interpretable results.

resultsExtensive simulations demonstrate that our proposed penalized CIA methods achieve the best or close to the best performance compared to the existing CIA method in terms of feature selection and recovery of true loading vectors. Also, we apply our methods to the integrative analysis of gene expression data and protein abundance data from the NCI-60 cancer cell lines. Our analysis of the NCI-60 cancer cell line data reveals meaningful variables for cancer diseases and biologically meaningful results that are consistent with previous studies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our algorithms are implemented as an R package which is freely available at: https://www.med.upenn.edu/long-lab/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyBiometryLeast-Squares AnalysisMultivariate Analysis

Identifiers

PMID30165424
PMCPMC6419918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.