ArticleJournal of radiation research2018
Determining survival fractions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to ionizing radiation in liquid culture.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oligotrophic state reduces the time dependence of the observed survival fraction for heavy ion beam-irradiatedApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024Article
- Heavy Ion Radiation Directly Induced the Shift of Oral Microbiota and Increased the Cariogenicity ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Modulation of the nanoscale motion rate ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Fluorescence Characteristics of Coalbed Methane Produced Water and Its Influence on Freshwater Bacteria in the South Qinshui Basin, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Repair characteristics and time-dependent effects in response to heavy-ion beam irradiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a comparison with X-ray irradiation.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Repair characteristics and time-dependent effects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells after X-ray irradiation.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Saccharomyces cerevisiae survival fractions (SFs) in response to X-ray radiation were determined by two new methods: an OD600-based method and a 96-well method. For the OD600-based method, cells were exposed to various X-ray doses and inoculated into fresh medium: a lower biomass accumulated, indicating fewer surviving cells within the investigated dose range (0-100 Gy). For the 96-well method, diluent containing ~0-100 cells was equally divided into 96 droplets and respectively inoculated into 96 wells containing 200 μl of broth: fewer wells without S. cerevisiae clones indicated more surviving cells after 48 h of incubation. Corresponding quantitative systems were established. Both methods were sensitive and reliable. The OD600-based method is simple and fast, and the 96-well method simplifies the counting process. SF estimates by the OD600-based method were lower than those by 96-well methods owing to cell cycle arrest. In addition, comparisons of newly proposed and plate-counting methods indicated a higher rate of repair in S. cerevisiae in liquid culture than on agar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.