ArticleEuropean heart journal2018
The 2018 ESC-ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension leave clinicians facing a dilemma in half of the patients.
Article in European heart journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Relationship between blood pressure and adverse clinical events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): a retrospective analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Prevalence of prediabetes and associated factors among community members in rural Isingiro district.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Uncontrolled blood pressure and associated factors in adult hypertensive patients undergoing follow-up at public health facility ambulatory clinics in Bishoftu town, Ethiopia: a multi-center study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Effects of isometric resistance training on resting blood pressure: individual participant data meta-analysis.Journal of hypertension · 2019Review
- What's new in the ESC 2018 guidelines for arterial hypertension : The ten most important messages.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
30165378What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.