Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30165373›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019

Characterizing protein-DNA binding event subtypes in ChIP-exo data.

Naomi Yamada, William K M Lai, Nina Farrell, B Franklin Pugh, Shaun Mahony

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. ChExMix: A Method for Identifying and Classifying Protein-DNA Interaction Subtypes.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naomi YamadaDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology and Center for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
William K M LaiDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology and Center for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Nina FarrellDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology and Center for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
B Franklin PughDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology and Center for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Shaun MahonyDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology and Center for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

REGULATION OF TBP DIMERSR01GM059055 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI PUGH, B FRANKLIN · 2000 to 2020
$6.6M
Promoter Regulation in Response to Environmental StressR01ES013768 · NIEHS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI PUGH, B FRANKLIN · 2007 to 2019
$4.9M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES013768NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationRegulatory proteins associate with the genome either by directly binding cognate DNA motifs or via protein-protein interactions with other regulators. Each recruitment mechanism may be associated with distinct motifs and may also result in distinct characteristic patterns in high-resolution protein-DNA binding assays. For example, the ChIP-exo protocol precisely characterizes protein-DNA crosslinking patterns by combining chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with 5' → 3' exonuclease digestion. Since different regulatory complexes will result in different protein-DNA crosslinking signatures, analysis of ChIP-exo tag enrichment patterns should enable detection of multiple protein-DNA binding modes for a given regulatory protein. However, current ChIP-exo analysis methods either treat all binding events as being of a uniform type or rely on motifs to cluster binding events into subtypes.

resultsTo systematically detect multiple protein-DNA interaction modes in a single ChIP-exo experiment, we introduce the ChIP-exo mixture model (ChExMix). ChExMix probabilistically models the genomic locations and subtype memberships of binding events using both ChIP-exo tag distribution patterns and DNA motifs. We demonstrate that ChExMix achieves accurate detection and classification of binding event subtypes using in silico mixed ChIP-exo data. We further demonstrate the unique analysis abilities of ChExMix using a collection of ChIP-exo experiments that profile the binding of key transcription factors in MCF-7 cells. In these data, ChExMix identifies possible recruitment mechanisms of FoxA1 and ERα, thus demonstrating that ChExMix can effectively stratify ChIP-exo binding events into biologically meaningful subtypes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: ChExMix is available from https://github.com/seqcode/chexmix. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingBinding SitesChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDNANucleotide MotifsProtein BindingSequence Analysis, DNADNA

Identifiers

PMID30165373
PMCPMC6419906
OpenAlexW2892572630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.